Skip to main content

Security report for ifinanses.lv

SIA "Izdevniecība iŽurnāli" · Media · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

iFinanses.lv is a Latvian online journal specializing in taxes, accounting, and labor law, operated by SIA "Izdevniecība iŽurnāli" since 2009. The site offers subscription-based access to expert articles, seminars, and digital resources targeting accounting and tax professionals, business managers, and self-employed individuals in Latvia. It maintains a professional market position with sister sites covering legal, business, and audio content. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced, reCAPTCHA on forms, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and user consent options. However, WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy with moderate technical performance and good security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ifinanses.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
25
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the media sector, focusing on specialized financial and legal content for Latvian professionals. Its subscription model is supplemented by paid seminars and expert Q&A services. The presence of multiple sister sites under the same publisher indicates a diversified content portfolio targeting related professional audiences. The company maintains direct contact channels and social media presence, enhancing customer engagement. The market positioning is stable with a medium-sized operation and a clear focus on Latvian regulatory and financial topics.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, and a detailed cookie consent mechanism supporting GDPR compliance. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not detected, representing an area for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, which could be enhanced to improve security readiness and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Establish a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all users.
  5. Maintain and publish clear data retention policies related to analytics and user data to improve privacy transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA "Izdevniecība iŽurnāli"
Description
iFinanses is an online journal focused on taxes, accounting, and labor law, providing updates, legal explanations, and expert answers.
Key services
Online journal articles, Seminars and webinars, Subscription services, Expert Q&A
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Font Awesome, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
GoSquared, Google Analytics (implied via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, LinkedIn Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, GoSquared Analytics
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, GoSquared
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms implemented.
  4. Multiple external tracking and marketing scripts used, with user consent.
  5. Website targets Latvian accounting, tax, and labor law professionals.
  6. Professional design and clear navigation structure observed.
  7. No explicit security.txt or incident response contact found.
  8. Contact information includes phone and email clearly presented.
  9. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data in HTML.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and Font Awesome for icons, indicating a standard modern web stack. Integration with Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and GoSquared analytics shows a comprehensive approach to marketing and user behavior tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing external script loading and caching. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The site lacks some advanced accessibility features but provides basic support.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ifinanses.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ifinanses.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.