Skip to main content

Security report for ierame.lv

Anda-2 SIA · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Vīgantes ierāmēšanas salons, operated by Anda-2 SIA, is a small Latvian business specializing in custom framing services including artwork, photographs, posters, embroidery, and mirrors. The company offers an online catalog and e-commerce capabilities via a WordPress WooCommerce platform, targeting local customers seeking framing and restoration services. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting a positive user experience. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including WooCommerce, jQuery, and tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enforced but lacking important security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional for its business purpose but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
33/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ierame.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
33
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the retail sector focusing on framing and restoration services, with a clear local market presence in Riga, Latvia. Its business model combines online product catalog browsing with service offerings, supported by e-commerce functionality. The company maintains active social media profiles on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, enhancing customer engagement. The presence of VAT and registration numbers indicates formal business registration. The website content and structure suggest a stable small business with a focus on quality and customer service. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The company could explore expanding digital marketing and security compliance to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration, which is a critical security baseline. However, it lacks several important HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to certain web-based attacks. The presence of password strength meters on login and registration forms is a positive security feature. No explicit incident response or security policy information is available, indicating potential gaps in formal security governance. Tracking technologies are used moderately, with IP anonymization enabled in Google Analytics, supporting some privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and formal security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security.
  4. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to demonstrate security governance.
  5. Verify and publish WHOIS domain registration details or use a service that allows WHOIS queries to improve trust and transparency.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Anda-2 SIA
VAT number
LV50003187901
Registration number
50003187901
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Anda-2 SIA
Description
Vīgantes ierāmēšanas salons piedāvā dažāda veida ierāmēšanas darbus! Mākslas darbu, objektu, fotogrāfiju, plakātu, izšuvumu uc veida ierāmēšana.
Key services
Ierāmēšanas darbi, Paspartū, Spoguļu ierāmēšana, Reprodukcijas, Gleznu restaurācija, Izšuvumi, Piegāde un uzstādīšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Fonts, Flickity slider
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Flatsome theme
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Password strength meter on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
WooCommerce Google Analytics Pro, Pixel Caffeine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress WooCommerce site for a local framing business in Latvia.
  2. Content is in Latvian language with clear business focus.
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  4. No explicit cookie consent mechanism found.
  5. Privacy policy and terms of service pages are present and accessible.
  6. Site uses HTTPS with no detected security headers.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  9. Site includes login and registration forms with password strength meter.
  10. Tracking via Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel is implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using the Flatsome theme and WooCommerce plugin, indicating a mature and widely supported e-commerce platform. It uses jQuery and Flickity for UI interactions and sliders, Google Fonts for typography, and integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and lazy loading of images. Accessibility features are basic but present. No hosting provider information was detected. The site could improve by adding advanced accessibility features and optimizing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ierame.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ierame.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.