Skip to main content

Security report for ieliecmaisa.lv

Ieliecmaisa.lv · Retail · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ieliecmaisa.lv is a Latvian e-commerce retailer specializing in various types of packaging products. The website offers a broad catalog of packaging materials including bags, boxes, and wrapping supplies, targeting primarily Latvian customers. The business operates with a clear focus on retail packaging solutions, supported by accessible customer contact channels such as phone and email. The site is built on the Magento platform with a modern Hyvä theme and uses Alpine.js for frontend interactivity, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The presence of structured data and clear navigation supports good user experience and SEO performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and published security policies. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for a small local packaging supplier.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ieliecmaisa.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a local Latvian packaging supplier with a focus on retail customers needing various packaging materials. The business model is e-commerce retail, leveraging Magento's platform capabilities. The site shows consistent branding and clear product categorization, which supports customer navigation and purchase decisions. Contact information is prominently displayed, enhancing customer trust. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the provided data. The company appears to be a small-sized entity with a localized market focus. The lack of WHOIS data limits deeper insights into company age or ownership, but the website content aligns with a legitimate small business operation.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses anti-CSRF tokens in forms, which are positive security practices. A cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating awareness of privacy compliance. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor vulnerability disclosure information, which are important for mature security management. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to enhance headers and publish security policies to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly linked from the website footer or main navigation to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a dedicated security or incident response page with contact information for reporting vulnerabilities or abuse.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are included.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ieliecmaisa.lv
Description
Visa Veida Iepakojums
Key services
Packaging products sales, Customer support via phone and email, Online product catalog and ordering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Alpine.js, Hyvä Themes, GraphQL
Frameworks
Hyvä Themes, Magento
Platforms
Magento e-commerce platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • Form key anti-CSRF tokens used

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; no registrar or domain age info.
  3. Site uses Magento platform with Hyvä theme and Alpine.js for frontend interactivity.
  4. Contact info including phone numbers and email is clearly presented.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented but privacy policy page not clearly found.
  6. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  7. Site content is professional, focused on packaging products for Latvian market.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  9. No social media links found in provided content.
  10. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Magento with a Hyvä theme, using Alpine.js for frontend interactivity and GraphQL for product data fetching. The site loads CSS and JS assets from its own domain, indicating self-hosted resources. Performance appears moderate with modern frontend technologies but could benefit from optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, with adaptive menus and search functionality. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, canonical links, and structured data. Accessibility is basic but present. The site uses form keys for CSRF protection and cookie consent for privacy. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small e-commerce site but can be improved with enhanced security headers and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ieliecmaisa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ieliecmaisa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.