Skip to main content

Security report for idonix.com

Idonix · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Idonix is a specialized provider of real-time graphics control, automation, and data management solutions tailored for the broadcast and live events industries. Their offerings include comprehensive data integration and workflow services for elections, esports, sports, game shows, and corporate presentations. The company has established a niche market position with notable clients such as the BBC, indicating a strong reputation in broadcast graphics services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation aimed at industry professionals. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack with integrations including Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and Zoho Forms for data collection. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though accessibility features are basic. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, but lack explicit security headers and published security policies. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are visible, which may impact user trust and support accessibility. From a security perspective, the site shows a solid baseline with encrypted connections and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy and transparency. The lack of published incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies suggests room for improvement in security maturity and compliance. Overall, Idonix presents as a credible and professional business with a focused service offering in media broadcast graphics. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing security and incident response policies, improving contact transparency, and verifying domain registration details to strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching idonix.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
72
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Idonix operates in the media sector, targeting broadcast and live event professionals with specialized software and services for graphics automation and data integration. Their competitive advantage lies in delivering tailored solutions for complex environments such as elections and sports broadcasting, supported by high-profile clients like the BBC. The business model is B2B, focusing on software and workflow automation services. The company maintains an active digital presence with social media channels and a newsletter, indicating engagement with industry professionals. Growth indicators include diverse service offerings and case studies showcasing expertise. The partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, but integrations with third-party analytics and form providers suggest a collaborative approach. Overall, Idonix demonstrates a focused market presence with potential for expansion through enhanced digital trust and security practices.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent, reflecting awareness of privacy and security best practices. Tracking and analytics are conducted via reputable services such as Google Analytics and LinkedIn Insight, with user consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The lack of visible contact information for security incidents limits incident response readiness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant concern, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified by the business type. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but would benefit from enhanced transparency, policy publication, and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Provide clear and accessible contact information for security and general inquiries to improve trust and communication.
  5. Verify and update domain registration details to ensure WHOIS data availability and legitimacy, reinforcing business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Idonix
Description
Real-time graphics control, automation and data management solutions for the broadcast and live events industries
Key services
Broadcast graphics services, Data integration, Workflow automation, Graphics automation framework (Ignition), Elections graphics solutions, Esports, sport, game shows, corporate presentations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Zoho Forms, Flexslider, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Numans)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via Zoho

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, Pagesense
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight, Pagesense
Marketing tools
Zoho Forms, Pagesense
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues
  3. Strong social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube
  4. Uses multiple tracking and analytics tools with cookie consent
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage or footer
  6. Multiple internal pages for services, about, careers, support, and news
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content
  9. Uses Zoho forms for data collection with hidden fields for tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes a modern front-end technology stack including JavaScript, jQuery, and third-party libraries such as Flexslider and Font Awesome. It integrates Google Fonts for typography and employs multiple analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight, and Zoho Forms for data collection. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts to improve user experience. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture, which may limit scalability. The lack of explicit security headers and limited accessibility features indicate areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but could benefit from modernization in security and accessibility domains.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with idonix.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review idonix.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.