Skip to main content

Security report for iconacapital.com

Icona Capital · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Icona Capital is a global alternative investment company specializing in private equity, debt solutions, and real estate investments. Founded in 2022 and part of the SWI Group, it targets high-growth sectors with a hands-on entrepreneurial approach to deliver sustainable growth. The company positions itself as a forward-thinking investment firm with a diversified portfolio and a focus on impactful investments. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using modern plugins and frameworks, hosted by Infomaniak Network SA, and employs HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism, reflecting a mature digital presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Overall, the website is professional, well-structured, and compliant with privacy regulations, though it lacks direct contact emails and phone numbers, relying on contact forms for communication.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iconacapital.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Icona Capital operates in the finance and real estate sectors, leveraging its parent company SWI Group's network and expertise. Its business model focuses on alternative investments, targeting institutional investors and businesses seeking private equity and debt solutions. The company emphasizes sustainability and impact investing, which aligns with current market trends favoring ESG considerations. The website content and portfolio news indicate active investment and strategic partnerships, such as acquisitions and minority stakes in related firms. The firm maintains a professional online presence with clear branding and comprehensive policy disclosures, supporting credibility and trust. Growth indicators include recent acquisitions and portfolio expansion. The partnership ecosystem includes SWI Group and Stoneweg, enhancing market reach and operational capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection enabled. Cookie consent is managed via CookieYes, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces the overall security posture. No security policy or incident response information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The use of reputable hosting and plugins reduces risk, but the site could improve by publishing a security policy, incident response contacts, and implementing DNSSEC and security headers. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but can be enhanced to meet higher standards and regulatory expectations.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  4. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Consider adding direct contact emails and phone numbers for better user trust and communication.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Icona Capital
Description
Icona Capital is a global alternative investment company. They bring entrepreneurial spirit and capital to drive meaningful and sustainable growth, focusing on private equity and debt solutions.
Key services
Private equity investments, Debt solutions, Real estate investments, Investment strategy consulting
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Bricks Builder theme, CookieYes (cookie consent management), Google Analytics (gtag.js), Cloudflare (bot management cookie), Frames plugin, Splide slider, Rank Math SEO plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with consent management.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact via form only.
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information published.
  5. Use of modern WordPress plugins and frameworks.
  6. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  7. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress with the Bricks Builder theme and uses several modern plugins including CookieYes for cookie consent, Rank Math for SEO, and Frames for UI components. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis. Hosting is provided by Infomaniak Network SA, a reputable provider. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates and has a responsive design optimized for mobile devices. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. Accessibility features are present and SEO is well implemented with meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). No broken elements or errors were detected. The technical stack is modern and well maintained, supporting a professional and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iconacapital.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iconacapital.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.