Skip to main content

Security report for ibcsolar.com

Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ww25.ibcsolar.com appears to be a parked domain primarily monetized through advertising networks such as Google Adsense and Bodis. The content is minimal, generic, and focused on solar energy-related keywords without providing substantive business information or services. The lack of WHOIS registration data and the use of a subdomain prefix 'ww25' are common indicators of domain parking or placeholder status rather than an active commercial website. Technically, the site uses basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with no modern frameworks or CMS detected. There is no HTTPS enabled, and no security headers are present, resulting in a weak security posture. Privacy and cookie policies exist but are basic and lack consent mechanisms. No contact information, social media links, or business credentials are provided, limiting trust and credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ibcsolar.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site targets the energy sector, specifically solar energy solutions, but does not present any identifiable company or business entity. There is no evidence of a business model beyond domain monetization through ads. The absence of contact details, certifications, or legal business information suggests this is not an operational business website. The domain's lack of WHOIS data and minimal content further indicate it may be held for resale or ad revenue rather than active commercial use. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified.

Security posture

Security maturity is low due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and no visible security policies or incident response contacts. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing some risk, but the overall lack of security best practices and transparency is concerning. There are no indications of vulnerabilities or malware, but the minimal technical implementation and missing SSL are critical issues. Compliance with GDPR or other privacy regulations is minimal, with no cookie consent mechanism detected.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.
  2. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Replace domain parking content with legitimate business information and services.
  4. Add clear contact information and enhance privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  5. Register the domain properly with transparent WHOIS data to improve trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
See relevant content for ibcsolar.com
Key services
solar energy solutions, solar panel installation, renewable energy services, photovoltaic systems, residential solar power
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Bodis (domain parking/monetization)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, Bodis
Tracking pixels
Google Adsense
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is primarily a parked domain with advertising content
  2. No meaningful business or contact information provided
  3. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration issues
  4. No HTTPS detected, security posture is weak
  5. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms beyond basic privacy/legal pages
  6. No forms or user input fields present
  7. No social media or contact emails found
  8. External links mostly to advertising and Google domains
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) found
  10. Content is minimal and generic, targeting solar energy keywords
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript and relies on third-party advertising scripts from Google Adsense and Bodis. There is no CMS or modern web framework detected. Performance is moderate but limited by the minimal content and external ad scripts. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no advanced features or ARIA roles detected. SEO is minimal, relying on meta description and keywords embedded in ad iframe parameters rather than structured data or rich snippets. The site lacks HTTPS, which is a significant technical and security deficiency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ibcsolar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ibcsolar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.