Skip to main content

Security report for ibblondon.com

IBB London · Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IBB London is a small retail business specializing in gold, silver, and diamond jewellery, including branded watches such as Lily & Lotty, Toy Watch, and Lulu Guiness. The website serves primarily as a brand showcase and e-commerce platform targeting consumers interested in fine jewellery. The digital infrastructure includes standard tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager, but lacks advanced technical frameworks or CMS identification. The website is accessible without WAF or security challenges, but the content is minimal and primarily a landing page redirecting users to the /home section. Security posture is basic with no evident security headers or HTTPS status provided, and privacy compliance is weak due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ibblondon.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ibblondon.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
14
Employees
0
Customers
14
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
14%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ibblondon.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the retail jewellery sector with a niche focus on gold, silver, and diamond products. The business model appears to be direct retail sales through an online presence. Market positioning is modest with no evident certifications or trust indicators on the site. The lack of contact information and corporate details limits transparency and may impact customer trust. The use of branded watches suggests partnerships or reseller relationships. There is no evidence of parent or subsidiary companies. The website's minimal content and basic design indicate a small-scale operation with potential for growth if digital maturity is improved.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS confirmation, security headers, and privacy policies indicates gaps in basic security hygiene and compliance. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, which limits readiness for security events. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking without clear privacy disclosures. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements such as GDPR.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS site-wide and verify SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers.
  4. Introduce security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection.
  5. Establish an incident response policy and publish vulnerability disclosure guidelines.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IBB London
Description
Gold and Silver Jewellery, Lily & Lotty, Toy Watch, Lulu Guiness
Key services
Gold jewellery sales, Silver jewellery sales, Diamond jewellery sales, Branded watches (Lulu Guiness, Toy Watch)
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges
  2. WHOIS data is missing, indicating possible domain registration or privacy issues
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage
  4. No contact information such as emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content
  5. Website uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking
  6. No forms detected on the landing page
  7. Website content is minimal and primarily a landing page redirecting to /home
  8. No social media links or email addresses found in the provided HTML
  9. No security headers detected in the provided data
  10. No SSL/TLS information provided; HTTPS status unknown
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses standard web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics scripts. The HTML is valid but minimal, with no advanced frameworks or CMS detected. Performance is moderate with basic mobile responsiveness. SEO is basic with meta tags but no structured data or Open Graph tags. The hosting provider and SSL status are unknown due to lack of data. There is opportunity to modernize the tech stack, improve accessibility, and enhance SEO through structured data and richer content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ibblondon.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ibblondon.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.