Skip to main content

Security report for iba-dosimetry.com

IBA Dosimetry · Healthcare · N/a

High risk. 4 critical or high findings in Network security and SSL/TLS.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

IBA Dosimetry operates a professional website focused on providing advanced radiation measurement solutions for healthcare providers, particularly in radiation therapy, particle therapy, and medical imaging. The company targets medical physicists and clinics with a B2B business model, offering precision instruments and related services. The website is built on TYPO3 CMS and integrates modern consent management tools such as Cookiebot and Google Tag Manager, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive privacy statement and detailed cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of explicit security headers and incident response information suggests room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data for the domain raises concerns about domain registration legitimacy, which should be verified to ensure trustworthiness. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy front for the business, with moderate technical performance and good user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iba-dosimetry.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
67
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

IBA Dosimetry is positioned as an important player in the healthcare technology sector, specializing in dosimetry and quality assurance products for radiation and particle therapy. The company leverages a B2B model targeting clinics and hospitals, with a product portfolio that includes machine QA, patient QA, and risk management solutions. The website's structured navigation and content indicate a focus on professional users and decision-makers in medical physics. The integration of third-party services like Zendesk for customer support and Cookiebot for compliance suggests a well-established partnership ecosystem. However, the absence of explicit contact information and WHOIS data may impact customer confidence and should be addressed. The company appears to maintain consistent branding and content quality, supporting its market position as a reliable provider in its niche.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data in the HTML content. The use of Cookiebot for granular cookie consent management aligns with GDPR requirements, indicating attention to privacy and data protection. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact information is also absent, which could delay handling of security incidents. The domain's missing WHOIS data is a notable concern, potentially indicating registration or privacy issues that affect trust. Enhancing security headers, publishing security policies, and providing clear incident response contacts would strengthen the security posture significantly.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response information page to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and update domain WHOIS information to ensure registration legitimacy and improve trust signals.
  4. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
IBA Dosimetry
Description
IBA Dosimetry provides advanced radiation measurement solutions including precision instruments and services for therapy, imaging, and particle therapy.
Key services
Radiation Therapy QA products, Particle Therapy QA products, Medical Imaging QA products, Consulting and services for clinics
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 CMS, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot Consent Management
Frameworks
TYPO3 CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Zendesk
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses TYPO3 CMS with modern consent management
  2. Cookie consent is implemented with detailed categories
  3. No WHOIS data available, indicating possible domain registration issues
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in provided content
  5. No terms of service page detected
  6. Privacy policy is comprehensive and GDPR compliant
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content
  9. Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot scripts present
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by TYPO3 CMS, a robust and widely used content management system, indicating a stable technical foundation. Integration of Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot shows a modern approach to analytics and privacy compliance. The site appears to be mobile optimized with good navigation clarity and professional design. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization signals. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but no comprehensive accessibility features detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing search engine visibility and social media sharing. The absence of explicit hosting provider information limits deeper infrastructure analysis. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iba-dosimetry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iba-dosimetry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.