Skip to main content

Security report for iae.lt

Valstybės įmonė Ignalinos atominė elektrinė · Energy · Lithuania

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ignalinos atominė elektrinė is a Lithuanian state enterprise responsible for the decommissioning of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, radioactive waste management, and environmental safety. The organization operates with EU funding and provides public education and transparency through its website. The site is well-structured, professionally designed, and offers comprehensive information about the company's activities, governance, and public engagement. Technically, the website uses AngularJS and EasyWeb CMS, with Google Analytics for visitor tracking and a cookie consent mechanism ensuring GDPR compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and XSRF protections, though some security headers could be added for enhanced protection. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, but the website content and contact details strongly support legitimacy. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for a government-owned energy entity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching iae.lt

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
30
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention iae.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
10
Employees
0
Customers
3
Third parties
7
Weak passwords
10%

1 subdomain affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for iae.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a key position in Lithuania's energy sector as the operator managing the legacy of nuclear power generation and its safe decommissioning. It benefits from EU funding and maintains transparency through detailed reporting and public communication. The business model focuses on nuclear decommissioning, radioactive waste handling, and environmental monitoring. The target audience includes government bodies, environmental agencies, contractors, and the general public. The website's content and linked partner domains indicate a well-established ecosystem with strategic partnerships. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and public engagement initiatives. The company’s large size and state ownership provide stability and credibility in the energy sector.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent with detailed categories, and protection against CSRF attacks. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options represents an area for improvement. There is no visible incident response or security policy page, which could enhance transparency and preparedness. The use of AngularJS 1.5.5, an older framework version, may pose some security risks if not regularly updated. Overall, the site is secure for public informational use but could benefit from enhanced security best practices and documented incident response procedures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response page to improve transparency and preparedness.
  2. Add security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen defense-in-depth.
  3. Regularly update and audit third-party libraries, especially AngularJS, to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance privacy compliance by providing detailed data retention policies and explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  5. Maintain and expand trust indicators by including certifications, awards, or third-party audits on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Valstybės įmonė Ignalinos atominė elektrinė
VAT number
LT 554500811
Registration number
255450080
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Valstybės įmonė Ignalinos atominė elektrinė
Description
Ignalinos atominė elektrinė is the former nuclear power plant in Lithuania, the only one in the Baltic states, which operated two of the most powerful reactors of its type worldwide. The company is engaged in decommissioning activities, radioactive waste management, environmental monitoring, and public engagement including educational tours.
Key services
Nuclear power plant decommissioning, Radioactive waste transportation and management, Environmental impact assessment, Public education and tours, Consultation and public communication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, AngularJS 1.5.5, EasyWeb 4 CMS, Slick Slider, Google Fonts (Montserrat)
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with detailed cookie categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of POST XSRF protection cookie

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded; WHOIS analysis limited.
  3. Site uses HTTPS with no visible security warnings.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories.
  5. No explicit privacy or security policy pages found except data protection page.
  6. No visible terms of service or vulnerability disclosure pages.
  7. Contact information is clearly provided in footer including phone, email, and physical address.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Twitter.
  9. Use of AngularJS 1.5.5 indicates somewhat dated frontend framework.
  10. Google Analytics used for visitor tracking with opt-in cookie consent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on EasyWeb 4 CMS with AngularJS 1.5.5 frontend framework and uses Google Fonts and Slick Slider for UI components. Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking with a cookie consent mechanism that respects user privacy choices. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with basic ARIA and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The lack of modern frontend frameworks and some missing security headers suggests some technical debt and opportunities for modernization. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be improved for enhanced security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with iae.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review iae.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.