Skip to main content

Security report for hzhm.hr

HZHM · Healthcare · Croatia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hrvatski zavod za hitnu medicinu (HZHM) is a Croatian public healthcare institution specializing in emergency medicine and telemedicine services across Croatia. The website serves as an informational portal primarily in Croatian, with an English language option, targeting the general public and healthcare professionals. The institution operates within the healthcare sector, providing essential emergency medical services and telemedicine support, positioning itself as a key national healthcare entity. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization, with basic accessibility features and good SEO practices. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but lacks several recommended security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is limited due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the institution's identity and location, supporting its legitimacy. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and incident response transparency would enhance trust and security maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hzhm.hr

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HZHM operates as a public healthcare provider focused on emergency medical services and telemedicine in Croatia. Its business model is service-oriented, funded likely by government or public health budgets. The website targets Croatian residents and healthcare stakeholders, offering information about emergency medical services. The institution holds a stable market position as a national healthcare entity. The digital presence is professional but lacks some compliance and security disclosures. There is no evidence of commercial revenue streams or partnerships from the website content. The organization appears medium-sized based on the scope of services and national coverage. No parent or subsidiary companies are indicated. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, supporting the institution's credibility.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security, which are critical for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics, which may involve user tracking without explicit consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and adding cookie consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner to obtain user consent for tracking and cookies.
  4. Publish an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  5. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HZHM
Description
Hrvatski zavod za hitnu medicinu, HZHM je javna zdravstvena ustanova za obavljanje djelatnosti hitne medicine i telemedicine na području RH, provodi načela dostupnosti i cjelovitog pristupa hitnoj medicinskoj službi.
Key services
hitna medicina, telemedicina
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Divi Theme, WordPress
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a public healthcare institution for emergency medicine in Croatia.
  2. Content is primarily in Croatian with English alternate language available.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage or metadata.
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with Divi theme and Google Tag Manager for analytics.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  7. SSL is enabled and appears properly configured.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with the Divi theme, a widely used and supported platform. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics, indicating a modern approach to data collection. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Performance is moderate, with caching and minified CSS observed. Accessibility features are basic but present. The site lacks advanced security configurations and some compliance-related content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features to reduce risk and improve compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hzhm.hr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hzhm.hr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.