Skip to main content

Security report for hypersphere.ventures

Hypersphere · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hypersphere is a specialized crypto-native investment platform focusing on venture capital and hedge funds within the blockchain and digital asset markets. The company targets asymmetric investment opportunities in both private and public blockchain networks, leveraging a team with combined crypto-native and traditional finance, legal, and compliance expertise. Their portfolio includes a broad range of early-stage and public blockchain projects, positioning them as a niche player in the crypto investment space. Technically, the website is built on a modern stack using Next.js and Sanity CMS, delivering fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. The site is professionally designed with clear navigation and relevant content, reflecting a mature digital presence. However, there is a lack of visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and does not expose sensitive data, but the absence of explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms indicates a moderate security posture. The WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection, which is common for investment firms but slightly reduces transparency. Overall, Hypersphere presents a professional and trustworthy front for its business, but enhancing privacy compliance and security transparency would strengthen its risk profile and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hypersphere.ventures

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hypersphere operates in the finance and technology sectors, focusing on crypto and blockchain investments. Their business model revolves around venture capital and hedge fund management targeting early-stage and public blockchain projects. The company appears to be small-sized, founded around 2020, with no parent or subsidiary companies disclosed. Their competitive advantage lies in their crypto-native expertise combined with traditional finance and compliance knowledge. The portfolio and team details suggest active investment and operational maturity. Social media presence on LinkedIn and X supports engagement with professional and investor communities. The absence of phone numbers and physical addresses may limit direct client engagement but aligns with a digital-first investment platform approach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and no sensitive data leakage is observed. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could delay response to security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies, potentially exposing the company to regulatory risks. The absence of analytics or tracking scripts reduces privacy concerns but also limits user behavior insights. Overall, the security posture is adequate for informational purposes but requires enhancements for compliance and resilience.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance web security.
  3. Develop and disclose an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Consider adding contact phone numbers and physical address to increase business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update the technology stack and security configurations to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hypersphere
Description
Hypersphere is a crypto-native investment platform designed to partner with early-stage and public blockchain networks. It aims to achieve exceptional returns through venture capital and hedge funds by targeting asymmetric opportunities in private and public digital asset markets. The team combines crypto-native backgrounds with world-class operations, finance, legal, and compliance expertise.
Key services
Venture capital investments, Hedge fund management, Partnerships with blockchain networks
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Sanity CMS, JavaScript, CSS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected on main page or footer
  3. Contact information limited to emails only, no phone or physical address found
  4. No visible security headers or explicit security policies published
  5. Strong focus on crypto investment with detailed portfolio and team information
  6. Modern tech stack with Next.js and Sanity CMS
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in HTML content
  8. Social media presence on LinkedIn and X (Twitter)
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, combined with Sanity CMS for content management. This stack supports server-side rendering and static site generation, contributing to fast load times and good SEO. The site uses multiple web fonts and optimized images, including video backgrounds, enhancing user experience. No third-party analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The absence of security headers and privacy-related pages suggests technical debt in compliance and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hypersphere.ventures. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hypersphere.ventures.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.