Skip to main content

Security report for huppa.be

Huppa · Retail · Belgium

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Huppa is a Belgian wholesale fresh food partner offering a broad assortment of over 13,000 products via a professional online webshop. The company targets wholesale buyers and partners in the fresh food sector, positioning itself as a go-to supplier in Belgium. The website is built on WordPress with Elementor and includes multilingual support via WPML. It features a modern design, good navigation, and mobile optimization, supporting a positive user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and privacy plugins, though explicit privacy and terms policies are not found, and WHOIS data is blocked, limiting transparency. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature digital presence suitable for its business model but could improve compliance and security disclosures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching huppa.be

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Huppa operates in the retail sector focusing on wholesale fresh food distribution. Its business model relies on an extensive product catalog and online ordering capabilities. The company maintains a partner program and offers print and promotional materials, indicating diversified service offerings. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn supports brand engagement. The domain WHOIS is privacy-protected, which is common but reduces transparency. The website's professional design and structured data indicate a well-established market position in Belgium. Related domains include a jobs portal and a print promo site, suggesting an ecosystem of related services.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses security/privacy plugins like Complianz for cookie management, indicating awareness of GDPR compliance. However, no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected, which is a compliance gap. Security headers are not detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present, limiting incident response readiness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found in the HTML content. The WHOIS data is blocked, which is a minor trust concern. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and policy publication.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  4. Consider providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Review WHOIS privacy settings to balance privacy with transparency appropriate for a wholesale business.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Huppa
Description
In onze webshop kies je uit meer dan 13.000 producten en bestel je wanneer het jou uitkomt. Handig. Snel. Zoals het hoort.
Key services
Wholesale fresh food products, Online webshop ordering, Partner program, Print & Promo materials
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, WPML (multilingual), jQuery, WP Rocket, Complianz GDPR plugin
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security/privacy plugins (Complianz)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional wholesale fresh food partner platform in Belgium
  2. Content is in Dutch with French alternate language available
  3. No explicit privacy or terms pages found in scanned content
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented
  5. No direct emails or phone numbers found in main HTML content
  6. Social media links present for Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn
  7. WHOIS data is blocked, limiting domain transparency
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  9. No explicit security or incident response policies found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and uses several plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization, WPML for multilingual support, and Complianz for GDPR cookie compliance. The site loads jQuery and uses WP Rocket for performance optimization. Fonts are loaded from Google Fonts and custom font files. The site is mobile optimized and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. Performance is moderate with good SEO metadata but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and security headers. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with huppa.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review huppa.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.