Skip to main content

Security report for huna.care

Huna · Healthcare · Spain

Partial score · DNS & email only

73/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Huna is a Spanish-language online platform specializing in beauty cultivation and facial self-massage education. It offers video tutorials, memberships, and wellness content aimed at individuals seeking to enhance their natural beauty and personal happiness. The website is professionally designed with consistent branding and good content quality, targeting a niche market in the healthcare and e-commerce sectors. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and tracking tools such as Google Tag Manager and Hotjar, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though some security headers and policies could be improved. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a privacy policy and terms of service, but lacks a cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the site appears trustworthy and legitimate, though WHOIS data is privacy protected and unavailable for deeper verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching huna.care

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention huna.care, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
30
Employees
0
Customers
27
Third parties
3
Weak passwords
43%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for huna.care.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Huna operates in the healthcare and e-commerce sectors, focusing on beauty and wellness education through online courses and memberships. Its market positioning is niche, targeting Spanish-speaking women interested in skincare and facial self-care rituals. The business model relies on subscription and direct sales of digital content. Trust indicators include customer testimonials and Trustpilot reviews. The company maintains active social media presence on Instagram and TikTok, supporting community engagement and marketing efforts. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a primarily digital-first customer interaction model. Growth potential exists in expanding course offerings and enhancing privacy and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, it lacks several recommended security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. There is no published security policy or incident response information, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files were found, reducing avenues for responsible vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected, which may pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional headers, policies, and user consent mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Huna
Description
Huna is a platform focused on beauty cultivation, self-care, and personal elevation through facial self-massage tutorials and related courses. It offers video tutorials, memberships, and inspirational content aimed at enhancing beauty and happiness.
Key services
Online video tutorials for facial self-massage, Membership programs, Beauty and wellness courses, Inspirational content and podcasts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Swiper.js, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Sendinblue
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form submission via POST

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar, Sendinblue
Marketing tools
Sendinblue
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Spanish targeting Spanish-speaking users.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form.
  4. Privacy and terms pages are present and linked in footer.
  5. No explicit cookie consent banner detected, which may be a GDPR compliance gap.
  6. Use of modern JS libraries and tracking tools indicates moderate digital maturity.
  7. Trustpilot integration and customer testimonials enhance credibility.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No exposed sensitive data or obvious security issues in HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and popular carousel libraries like Slick and Swiper for interactive content. It integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, and Sendinblue for email automation. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive layouts and adaptive media. Performance is moderate, with multiple video assets that may impact load times but are optimized with lazy loading. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with huna.care. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review huna.care.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.