Skip to main content

Security report for huebener-ag.eu

Hübener Versicherung · Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hübener Versicherung is a Europe-wide specialist insurance provider, operating primarily in the finance sector. The website presents a professional appearance with multilingual support, targeting European insurance clients. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress CMS with performance optimizations such as WP Rocket and preconnect hints. The site uses Fathom Analytics for minimal user tracking, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Security posture is basic, with no advanced security headers or incident response information visible. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching huebener-ag.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a specialist insurer with a Europe-wide market reach. The business model focuses on providing tailored insurance products. The website's multilingual setup suggests targeting diverse European markets. There is no explicit information on company size, founding year, or subsidiaries. The lack of visible trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials limits the assessment of competitive advantages. The use of reputable hosting and CMS platforms supports operational reliability. The absence of detailed contact information and compliance documentation may impact customer trust and regulatory adherence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No incident response contacts or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The minimal use of tracking and absence of forms reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement features. The security score is moderate, with recommendations to implement standard security headers, publish privacy and cookie policies, and establish incident response contacts to improve overall security maturity and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish an incident response contact email and consider a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet recognized standards.
  5. Include clear contact information and trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials to improve business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hübener Versicherung
Description
Europe-wide specialist insurer offering insurance services.
Key services
Specialist insurance products
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
WordPress, WP Rocket
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Fathom Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Fathom Analytics
Marketing tools
Rank Math PRO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is primarily in German with multilingual support via hreflang tags.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML snippet.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with performance optimization via WP Rocket.
  6. Includes preconnect and preload hints for performance.
  7. Uses Fathom Analytics for minimal user tracking.
  8. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  9. No visible forms or data collection fields in the provided content.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided snippet.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with performance enhancements via WP Rocket. It uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS with font preloading and preconnect optimizations. Hosting is provided by IONOS SE, a reputable provider. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with hreflang tags for multilingual support. However, no advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries beyond standard WordPress plugins are detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with huebener-ag.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review huebener-ag.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.