Skip to main content

Security report for hubchannel.com.br

HubChannel · Media · Brazil

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HubChannel is a Brazilian startup specializing in digital content publication and monetization solutions, targeting media companies, content creators, and corporate education sectors. Their platform offers modular services including LMS for corporate education, digital content viewers, digital archives, and news applications. The company positions itself as a hub for multi-channel digital content management and monetization. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and Bootstrap, leveraging Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and RD Station Forms, alongside a chatbot for user engagement. However, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS support, which poses security risks. Email security is partially addressed with SPF and DMARC records, but DNSSEC and CAA records are absent. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity with room for security and performance improvements.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of hubchannel.com.br. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hubchannel.com.br

This scan found 20 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HubChannel operates in the media sector with a focus on digital content publishing and monetization. Their business model is SaaS-based, offering a platform with multiple modules tailored for media outlets and corporate education. The company leverages partnerships and maintains a presence on major social media platforms to enhance brand visibility. Revenue streams likely include subscriptions or licensing fees for their platform modules. The target audience includes media companies seeking multi-channel content distribution and creators looking to monetize digital content. The startup status and small size suggest growth potential, with a focus on innovation in digital publishing technologies. The integration of marketing tools and lead capture forms indicates an active approach to customer acquisition and engagement.

Security posture

The current security posture of HubChannel's website is basic with significant gaps. While SPF and DMARC records are configured to protect email integrity, the absence of DNSSEC and CAA records reduces DNS and certificate issuance security. Critically, the website lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS protocols, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No security headers were detected, and advanced protections like HSTS and OCSP stapling are not enabled. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating limited transparency in security governance. The cookie consent mechanism is present, supporting some privacy compliance, but no privacy policy or terms of service documents were found, which may expose the company to regulatory risks. Overall, the security maturity is low, requiring urgent improvements to protect user data and comply with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate supporting TLS 1.2 or 1.3 to secure all website traffic.
  2. Enable HSTS with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS usage and prevent downgrade attacks.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance DNS security and restrict certificate authorities.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents to improve regulatory compliance and user trust.
  5. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Bootstrap framework, indicating a flexible and widely supported technology stack. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, enhancing availability and performance. However, the SSL/TLS configuration is critically lacking, with no valid certificate and no TLS protocols enabled, severely impacting security and user trust. The page load time is high (~19 seconds) with a large page size (~2.5MB) and many resources (416), suggesting optimization opportunities. The site uses multiple external scripts and fonts, including Google Fonts, FontAwesome, and various marketing and analytics tools. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is basic. The technical debt includes outdated or missing security configurations and performance inefficiencies that could affect business operations and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 70/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hubchannel.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hubchannel.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.