Skip to main content

Security report for hrhgeology.com

HRH Geology · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HRH Geology operates a specialized geological software platform called GravitasEDGE, targeting the energy sector with cloud-based operations geology tools. The platform integrates multiple applications for well data visualization, analysis, and reporting, supporting mobile access and global collaboration. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with Elementor and uses modern tracking and analytics tools. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA implemented, but lacks explicit security headers and privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, despite the professional appearance and active content. Overall, the site demonstrates good technical maturity but requires improvements in compliance and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 17 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hrhgeology.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
85
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HRH Geology positions itself as a niche provider of advanced geological software solutions for operational geoscience in the energy industry. Their SaaS model leverages cloud technology to enhance collaboration and productivity on rigs and offices worldwide. The company emphasizes integration, data orchestration, and mobile accessibility, targeting geologists and drilling professionals. The website content is professionally crafted, highlighting key services and industry applications, but lacks detailed business registration or contact information. The market presence appears focused and specialized, with potential growth through digital transformation in energy exploration workflows.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating baseline security awareness. However, it lacks explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, as well as incident response contacts, suggests gaps in compliance and readiness. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a significant red flag, impacting trust and raising questions about domain ownership and legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires enhancements in policy transparency and domain registration clarity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen web security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for support and incident response.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to establish domain legitimacy and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and plugins.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HRH Geology
Description
HRH Geology provides advanced geological software solutions focused on operations geology for the energy sector. Their GravitasEDGE platform offers cloud-based tools for well planning, drilling, monitoring, and reporting, integrating multiple applications such as Winlog, EZ-Correlate, PoreView, and Reporter. The platform supports mobile access and global collaboration with API integration and data orchestration.
Key services
Operations geology software suite, Log visualization and analysis, Well correlation, Pore pressure monitoring, Automated reporting, Mobile app for data access, API for operational geoscience, Data orchestration and integration
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, YouTube iframe API, CANDDi tracking, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Elementor page builder
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, CANDDi
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CANDDi
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is focused on a niche geological software platform for energy sector
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the page
  5. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  6. WHOIS data missing or domain not registered, which is unusual
  7. Tracking scripts present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism
  8. No visible security incident response or vulnerability disclosure information
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder, leveraging popular libraries and services such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, YouTube API, and CANDDi tracking. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate with no major issues detected. However, the site could benefit from improved accessibility compliance and additional security hardening. The lack of hosting provider information and domain registration details introduces some operational risk. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but with room for modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hrhgeology.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hrhgeology.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.