House of Pictures, operated by Image Professionals GmbH, is a premium photo agency specializing in interior and lifestyle photography with a Scandinavian aesthetic. Established in 2000 and based in Munich, Germany, it serves lifestyle publications worldwide by licensing feature stories and images. The website is professionally designed, content-rich, and targets creative professionals and media outlets. Technically, the site uses a combination of jQuery and React 15.4.0, with Matomo analytics configured to disable cookies, reflecting privacy awareness. However, some legacy technologies and lack of visible security headers suggest room for modernization. Security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, but the absence of explicit cookie consent and security policies are notable gaps. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces domain trustworthiness despite the professional appearance and clear business information. Overall, the site is functional, secure, and compliant with privacy regulations but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security hardening.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
61
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention houseofpictures.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for houseofpictures.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The company holds a strong market position as a leading premium home and living photo agency with a Scandinavian focus. Its business model revolves around licensing curated feature stories and images to specialized magazines and books globally. The target audience includes lifestyle publications, photographers, and creative professionals. The company maintains a broad partnership ecosystem with related brands in food media, garden photography, and scientific imagery, enhancing its market reach. The website's content quality and branding consistency support its credibility and professional reputation. Growth indicators include a large collection of creatives and continuous feature updates. The lack of WHOIS data is a concern but does not currently impact operational credibility.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and Matomo analytics is configured to disable cookies, indicating privacy-conscious practices. However, no security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, and there is no published security policy or incident response contact information. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap under GDPR. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified. The site would benefit from implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, and establishing incident response contacts to improve its security posture and compliance readiness.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
Add an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
Publish a formal security policy and provide clear incident response contact channels such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
Regularly update and audit third-party libraries and frameworks to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Enhance accessibility features and mobile optimization to improve user experience and compliance.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Image Professionals GmbH
Description
House of Pictures is matching feature stories with lifestyle publications around the world and licenses these to specialized magazines and books. It is the leading photo agency for premium interior and lifestyle features with a distinct Scandinavian aesthetic, showcasing work of over 250 creatives since 2000.
Key services
Photo licensing, Feature story matching, Image requests, Photographer information and support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, React 15.4.0, Matomo Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
Disabling cookies in Matomo analytics for privacy
Analytics and tracking
Services
Matomo
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
No WHOIS data available, which is unusual for a .com domain.
Privacy and terms pages are present and accessible.
No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected despite use of analytics.
No visible security headers or explicit security policies.
Multiple related brands and partner sites linked.
Use of Matomo analytics with cookie disabling indicates privacy awareness.
No adult or questionable content detected.
Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and address.
Use of older React version (15.4.0) and jQuery indicates some legacy technology.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a combination of jQuery and an older version of React (15.4.0), indicating some legacy technology usage. Matomo analytics is integrated with cookie disabling for privacy. The site is responsive with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) describing the organization and brand. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. The absence of a CMS detection suggests a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt is indicated by legacy React and lack of modern security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize the tech stack, improve performance, and enhance security configurations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with houseofpictures.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review houseofpictures.com.