Skip to main content

Security report for houseofhair.lv

House Of Hair · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

House Of Hair is a professional hairdressing and beauty salon based in Riga, Latvia, offering a range of services including haircuts, coloring, styling, extensions, beauty procedures, and make-up. The business targets a general audience seeking quality beauty services and has established a local reputation supported by awards and social media presence. The website reflects a small but professional operation with consistent branding and good content quality. Technically, the site uses a modern but somewhat dated tech stack including Bootstrap 3 and jQuery 3.2, with integrations for Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile optimized and has good navigation and SEO practices. Security posture is moderate; while HTTPS is assumed (not explicitly confirmed), no advanced security headers or policies are detected, and no forms are present to assess input security. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie consent banner and a privacy policy page, but lacks detailed security or incident response policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain trust analysis. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could improve security and compliance transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching houseofhair.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

House Of Hair operates in the hospitality sector focusing on beauty and hairdressing services. It leverages awards and social media to build trust and market presence. The business model is service-oriented, targeting local customers in Riga. The website supports marketing efforts with tracking tools and partner integrations. The company appears small-sized, founded around 2016, with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The partnership with the developer 'pokkers.lv' indicates professional web development support. Growth indicators include active social media and digital marketing. The business ecosystem includes collaborations with recognized brands and beauty product partners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is presumably enabled but not explicitly confirmed. No HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) are detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. The site uses multiple third-party scripts which require regular security audits to prevent vulnerabilities. No forms are present, reducing attack surface from input vectors. Privacy compliance is basic with cookie consent but lacks detailed policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are found. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and verify HTTPS with strong TLS configuration and test using SSL Labs.
  2. Add HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish detailed privacy and security policies including data protection and incident response information.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of third-party scripts and dependencies to identify vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
House Of Hair
Description
Profesionāls frizirmeistaru un skaistumkopšanas salons Pārdaugavā. House Of Hair offers hairdressing and beauty services with a focus on professional haircuts, coloring, styling, and beauty treatments.
Key services
Hair cutting & styling, Hair coloring & procedures, Hair extensions, Beauty procedures, Style consultations, Make-up
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 3.3.6, jQuery 3.2.1, Owl Carousel, BxSlider, Google Maps API, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Google Tag Manager, Modernizr
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. Cookie consent banner present and functional.
  4. No explicit privacy or security policies beyond cookie notice found.
  5. Multiple social media and partner links present.
  6. No forms detected in HTML content.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  8. Use of multiple third-party analytics and tracking scripts.
  9. Content is in Latvian language with some English phrases.
  10. Business appears to be a small local hair and beauty salon.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a classic web technology stack with Bootstrap 3.3.6 and jQuery 3.2.1, along with popular plugins like Owl Carousel and BxSlider for UI components. Google Maps API is integrated for location display. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile responsive and has good SEO meta tags and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with some potential for optimization by updating libraries and reducing third-party script load. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Hosting provider details are not available from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with houseofhair.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review houseofhair.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.