Skip to main content

Security report for hotelzalasala.lv

Zaļā sala · Hospitality · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Zaļā sala is a small hospitality business operating a guest house near Rēzekne, Latvia, offering accommodation, event hosting spaces, traditional Latgale cuisine dining, and leisure activities. The website is built on WordPress with a moderate technical infrastructure including common plugins and sliders. The site is well-branded and provides a good user experience with multilingual support. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain registration trust verification. Overall, the site appears legitimate and professionally maintained but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hotelzalasala.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
73
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business targets tourists and event organizers in the Latgale region, leveraging local cultural cuisine and leisure offerings to differentiate itself. The presence of a Booking.com affiliate link suggests integration with global booking platforms. The business model focuses on hospitality services with a small-scale operation. The website content and structure support clear navigation and service presentation, but lack of detailed contact info and policies may limit trust for some users. The company appears to maintain a modest but consistent online presence with social media engagement limited to Facebook.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, which is a strong baseline for security. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. The site lacks visible incident response contacts or security policies, which could hinder timely response to security incidents. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no GDPR or cookie consent mechanisms evident. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to the latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and consider establishing an incident response process.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO by adding structured data (JSON-LD) and improving meta tags.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Zaļā sala
Description
Zaļā sala is a guest house offering accommodation, event spaces, dining with traditional Latgale cuisine, and leisure activities near Rēzekne, Latvia.
Key services
Accommodation, Event spaces, Dining with Latgale national dishes, Leisure activities (mini golf, table tennis, swimming, etc.), Room decoration, Souvenirs, Gift cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3.18, jQuery 1.12.4, FlexSlider, MetaSlider, Contact Form 7, FooBox Image Lightbox, TemplatesNext Toolkit, Kirki Customizer
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of secure WordPress plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based hospitality site for Zaļā sala guest house in Latvia.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook link.
  6. Site uses HTTPS with valid SSL.
  7. No security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Affiliate link to Booking.com present for room reservations.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.18 with common plugins such as Contact Form 7, MetaSlider, and FooBox Lightbox. It uses jQuery 1.12.4, which is an older version and could be updated for security and performance. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs like Google Fonts and BootstrapCDN. Performance is moderate with standard slider animations and responsive design. Accessibility features are basic, with some screen reader text present. SEO optimization is minimal, lacking structured data and advanced meta tags. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hotelzalasala.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hotelzalasala.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.