Skip to main content

Security report for hotelmoskva.cz

Interhotel Zlín a.s. · Hospitality · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Interhotel Zlín a.s. is a medium-sized hospitality business operating a newly renovated four-star hotel located in the center of Zlín, Czech Republic. The hotel positions itself as the largest congress hotel in the region, offering modern accommodation, conference facilities, multiple restaurants, wellness, and sports amenities. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear business focus on hospitality and conference services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS using common libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, and FontAwesome, with integration of a third-party booking engine (Bookolo). The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is basic with a cookie policy present but no active consent mechanism. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hotelmoskva.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the hospitality sector targeting general audiences including business and leisure travelers seeking accommodation and conference services in Zlín. Its competitive advantage includes being the first officially certified hotel in the city and offering extensive conference and gastronomic facilities. The business model centers on hotel room bookings, event hosting, and food services. The website content and structure support a medium-sized enterprise with a focus on regional market leadership. Partnerships include the booking engine provider and certification bodies. Growth indicators include recent rebranding and website modernization. No direct competitors or subsidiaries were identified from the data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive information. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a gap that could be exploited by attackers. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The site does not implement a cookie consent mechanism, which may affect GDPR compliance. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended best practices and policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to enhance GDPR compliance and user privacy control.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to prevent vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and search visibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Interhotel Zlín a.s.
Description
Nově zrekonstruovaný čtyřhvězdičkový hotel v samém centru města Zlín. Ideální kongresové centrum se skvělou polohou nabízí mimořádný komfort moderních pokojů a špičkově vybavené konferenční i gastronomické zázemí. Pět restaurací, 2 velké kongresové sály a 5 salonků, wellness a sportovní zázemí.
Key services
Hotel accommodation, Conference facilities, Gastronomy, Wellness and sports
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, FontAwesome, jQuery UI, Bookolo Booking Engine
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Bookolo Booking Engine
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich.
  2. No visible security headers detected; opportunity for improvement.
  3. No explicit privacy or security policy pages beyond cookie policy.
  4. No contact phone numbers explicitly labeled found.
  5. No forms collecting personal data detected on the homepage.
  6. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  7. No social media links found in the provided HTML content.
  8. Official certification prominently displayed as a trust indicator.
  9. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a standard set of front-end libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel for sliders, FontAwesome for icons, and jQuery UI for UI components. It integrates a third-party booking engine (Bookolo) for room reservations. The site uses responsive design techniques and includes meta tags for SEO and viewport settings for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate with no explicit indicators of slow loading but could benefit from optimization. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries like React or Angular are used, indicating a traditional web architecture. The lack of security headers and limited accessibility features suggest areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hotelmoskva.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hotelmoskva.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.