Skip to main content

Security report for hotel-centrum.sk

Congress Hotel Centrum Košice · Hospitality · Slovakia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and DNS health.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Congress Hotel Centrum Košice is a hospitality business located in Košice, Slovakia, offering accommodation, restaurant services, and event hosting including weddings, conferences, and exhibitions. It positions itself as the largest congress center in Košice, targeting a general audience including business and leisure travelers. The website content is professionally presented with clear navigation and relevant service descriptions. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as jQuery, Cookiebot for cookie consent, Google Analytics, and Facebook Pixel for marketing and analytics purposes. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks some advanced accessibility features. From a security perspective, the website implements cookie consent mechanisms and uses HTTPS, although explicit security headers are not detected. There is no published privacy policy or terms of service, which are important for compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The domain registration is privacy protected, which is typical for this business type and does not raise immediate concerns. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in transparency and technical security controls. The overall risk assessment is low to moderate. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages, enhancing security headers, and providing incident response contacts. These steps will improve compliance, user trust, and security maturity. The website is suitable for its hospitality business purpose but should address compliance gaps to align with GDPR and best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hotel-centrum.sk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hotel operates in the hospitality sector with a focus on accommodation, gastronomy, and event hosting. It leverages its central location in Košice and large congress facilities as competitive advantages. The business model includes direct bookings via the website and hosting various events such as weddings and corporate meetings. Revenue streams likely include room bookings, restaurant services, event space rental, and commercial office rentals. The target customers are local and international visitors, event organizers, and corporate clients. The presence of social media and online reservation forms indicates a digital engagement strategy. The partnership with Fotogabo for website creation suggests local collaboration. Growth indicators are not explicit but the site content implies active event marketing and seasonal promotions.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The lack of a published privacy policy and incident response contacts represents compliance and operational gaps. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools is transparent via cookie declarations. Overall, the site is functional and reasonably secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page clearly accessible from the website footer or main menu.
  2. Add a terms of service page detailing user rights, liabilities, and service conditions.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Provide clear incident response and abuse contact information to improve security readiness.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent settings to ensure full GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Congress Hotel Centrum Košice
Description
Congress Hotel Centrum v Košiciach ponúka ubytovanie, medzinárodnú gastronómiu, priestory pre svadby, konferencie, kongresy a výstavy.
Key services
Accommodation, Restaurant, Wedding venues, Conferences and congresses, Exhibition spaces, Office and commercial space rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, jQuery UI, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/opt-out
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URLs but not explicitly confirmed)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Cookie consent is implemented using Cookiebot with detailed cookie categories
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  4. Contact information includes phone number and physical address but no email addresses found
  5. Social media presence limited to Facebook
  6. Use of common analytics and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  8. Website content is professional and relevant to hospitality industry
  9. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional web stack with jQuery and jQuery UI for UI components and interactions. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, providing a detailed and user-friendly consent dialog. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site includes responsive design elements and meta tags for SEO optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were identified from the content. Performance appears moderate with image banners and scripts loaded asynchronously. Accessibility features are basic, with some ARIA roles and labels present but no advanced accessibility framework detected. The site could benefit from modernization with newer frameworks and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 66/100Medium34 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hotel-centrum.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hotel-centrum.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.