Skip to main content

Security report for hospital-bn.cz

Nemocnice Rudolfa a Stefanie Benešov · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and Network security.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Nemocnice Rudolfa a Stefanie Benešov is a regional hospital in the Czech Republic providing a wide range of healthcare services including inpatient care, outpatient clinics, emergency services, and specialized departments. The website serves as an information portal for patients and visitors, offering detailed department listings and news updates. The hospital positions itself as a trusted healthcare partner in the region. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Analytics for visitor tracking, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and performance. Security measures include HTTPS enforcement, security headers, and reCAPTCHA on forms, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is strong with no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy compliance is well addressed with comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and user consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. However, the absence of WHOIS data and lack of published security policies or incident response contacts represent areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and serves its healthcare audience effectively. Strategic recommendations include publishing explicit security and incident response policies, verifying domain registration details, and maintaining regular security audits to sustain trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hospital-bn.cz

This scan found 12 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
80
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospital operates in the healthcare sector, targeting patients and healthcare consumers primarily in the Benešov region of the Czech Republic. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on comprehensive medical care through various departments and ambulances. The website reflects a well-established institution with a large operational size. The partnership with www.benes-michl.cz suggests collaboration with professional service providers for web development or media. The hospital's market position is regional but significant, with a focus on quality and patient safety. Revenue streams likely include public healthcare funding and patient services. Growth indicators include ongoing infrastructure projects and active communication channels. The hospital maintains a professional online presence with trust signals such as privacy compliance and patient reviews.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented. Use of reCAPTCHA protects forms from automated abuse. Cookie consent mechanisms comply with GDPR, enhancing privacy protections. No exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. However, the lack of a publicly available security policy or incident response contact limits transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file was found, which could improve security communication. Overall, the site balances usability and security well but should enhance its security documentation and incident readiness disclosures to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user protections.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to facilitate reporting of security issues.
  3. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance WHOIS data transparency by ensuring domain registration details are publicly accessible and accurate.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Nemocnice Rudolfa a Stefanie Benešov
Description
Jsme Vaším partnerem na cestě ke zdraví. Každý den pečujeme o Vaše zdraví díky týmové spolupráci.
Key services
Inpatient hospital care, Outpatient clinics and ambulances, Emergency services, Specialized departments (e.g. gynecology, oncology, pediatrics)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Cookiebot, Bootstrap, jQuery, Google Fonts, reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Google Ads conversion tracking
Marketing tools
Google Ads
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professional and relevant to healthcare services.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  4. No contact emails explicitly found in provided HTML snippet; phone numbers and addresses likely on contact pages.
  5. No security.txt or explicit vulnerability disclosure found.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, which is unusual but not necessarily suspicious for a hospital domain.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Google Fonts for typography, Google Analytics for visitor tracking, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site loads asynchronously loaded scripts such as reCAPTCHA and analytics, improving performance. The HTML structure is valid and includes accessibility features such as ARIA labels and skip links. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details were not found. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience with good security and privacy integrations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hospital-bn.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hospital-bn.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.