Skip to main content

Security report for hospicjakub.cz

Domácí hospic sv. Jakuba Prachatice · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Domácí hospic sv. Jakuba v Prachaticích is a specialized home hospice care provider focused on delivering comprehensive palliative care to terminally ill patients in their homes. The organization emphasizes compassionate care that includes medical, social, psychological, and spiritual support, aiming to preserve patient dignity and comfort. Their services are targeted primarily at patients and families within Prachatice and surrounding areas, offering 24/7 care and equipment lending to ease caregiving burdens. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and jQuery, providing a professional and responsive user experience. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the website content and contact information appear legitimate and professional. Overall, the site is well-structured and informative but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hospicjakub.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hospicjakub.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hospicjakub.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The hospice operates as a small, essential entity within the healthcare and non-profit sectors, serving a local community with specialized home care services. Its business model revolves around providing palliative care and support to patients and families, likely funded through donations and community support. The website reflects a focused market position with clear service offerings and a strong emphasis on patient dignity and family involvement. The presence of a Facebook page indicates some level of community engagement. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests room for improvement in regulatory compliance. No evident partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, ensuring secure data transmission. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or incident response contacts was found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No tracking or analytics scripts were detected, which reduces privacy risks but also limits insight into user behavior. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response readiness.
  4. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with relevant standards and improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domácí hospic sv. Jakuba Prachatice
Description
Domácí hospic sv. Jakuba v Prachaticích nabízí specializovanou domácí hospicovou péči pro nevyléčitelně nemocné pacienty, umožňující jim žít závěr života doma mezi blízkými. Poskytuje komplexní zdravotní, sociální, psychologickou a duchovní péči, včetně léčby bolesti, zapůjčení pomůcek a podporu rodině.
Key services
specializovaná domácí zdravotní péče 24/7, ošetřovatelská péče včetně léčby bolesti a ošetřování ran, zapůjčení zdravotnických pomůcek, podpora a doprovázení rodin, pomoc při péči o zemřelého
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and jQuery.
  4. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email.
  6. No security headers detected, which is a security improvement area.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. Content is healthcare focused, safe, and targeted at general audience.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
  10. Website design and navigation are good and professional.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a widely used CMS (WordPress) with the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery for frontend interactions. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good content structure and navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML or CSS. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimizations and accessibility features. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The absence of analytics tools suggests minimal data collection, which may be intentional for privacy reasons. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small healthcare provider but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hospicjakub.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hospicjakub.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.