Skip to main content

Security report for hoornzingthollands.nl

Hoorn Zingt Hollands · Hospitality · Netherlands

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hoorn Zingt Hollands is a Dutch music festival event organizer promoting a regional festival scheduled for August 31, 2025, in Julianapark Hoorn. The website serves as a promotional platform featuring artist lineups, ticket sales via a third-party platform, and social media engagement. The target audience is general public interested in Dutch music and festivals. The business model revolves around event organization and ticket sales, positioning itself as a popular regional festival with a strong local cultural focus. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, with integrations for YouTube embeds, Swiper.js for carousels, and tracking via TikTok Pixel and Google Tag Manager. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate with room for improvement. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or security policies. No contact information for security incidents or data protection officers is provided. Cookie consent is implemented, indicating some privacy compliance efforts. The WHOIS data is consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security disclosures, improved contact transparency, and additional security hardening to increase trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hoornzingthollands.nl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival targets Dutch music fans in the Hoorn region, leveraging well-known Dutch artists to attract attendees. Revenue streams primarily come from ticket sales via a partner ticketing platform. The partnership ecosystem includes local businesses and sponsors visible on the partners section. The business operates in the hospitality and entertainment sector with a focus on live events. Growth indicators include scheduled future events and active social media presence. Competitive advantages include a curated lineup of popular Dutch artists and a strong regional brand identity.

Security posture

The current security posture is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no privacy policy or terms of service. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of contact channels. The use of third-party tracking pixels introduces privacy considerations. Overall, the site should improve transparency and implement additional security controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking pixels for privacy and security risks.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve inclusivity and SEO.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hoorn Zingt Hollands
Description
Het gezelligste festival van de regio met vele toppers van Nederlandse bodem! 🇳🇱 🎶 🥳
Key services
Music festival event, Ticket sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Lite YouTube Embed, Swiper.js, Google Fonts, TikTok Pixel, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
TikTok Analytics, Google Analytics via GTM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel
Marketing tools
TikTok Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a promotional site for a Dutch music festival scheduled for August 31, 2025.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via external script.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the main page.
  5. Social media presence includes Facebook, Instagram, and Spotify links.
  6. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks (Next.js, React).
  7. Includes ticket sales via external ticketing platform.
  8. No visible security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. No structured data (JSON-LD) found in the HTML content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities. It integrates multiple third-party services for analytics and ticket sales. The site is mobile responsive and uses optimized images with srcset for performance. However, no CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or static site generation approach. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script loading. The technical stack is current but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hoornzingthollands.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hoornzingthollands.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.