Skip to main content

Security report for homedoc.at

Homedoc · Healthcare · Austria

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security and Security headers.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Homedoc is a healthcare service platform based in Austria that facilitates medical home visits and office visits primarily in Vienna and its surroundings. The company targets private and elective doctors as well as patients with limited mobility or time constraints, offering an easy-to-use online booking system for home doctor visits. Homedoc manages appointment scheduling, route optimization, patient communication, and payment processing, positioning itself as a leading provider in the home healthcare coordination market in the region. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive legal and privacy information, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Enfold theme and integrates modern tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and CookieYes for consent management. The site demonstrates good SEO and accessibility practices, although some security headers could be improved. HTTPS is enforced, and no critical vulnerabilities are evident from the content analysis. Privacy compliance is strong, with detailed cookie consent and GDPR-aligned policies. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and consent mechanisms, but the absence of explicit security policies and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement. No suspicious or malicious content was detected, and the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Overall, Homedoc presents a trustworthy and professional online presence suitable for its healthcare service model. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a formal security policy, conducting regular security audits, and improving accessibility features to further strengthen compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching homedoc.at

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
83
Average
56
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Homedoc operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on home medical visits in Vienna. Its competitive advantage lies in offering a flexible platform for doctors to earn additional income with optimized scheduling and route planning, while providing patients with convenient access to medical care at home or office. The business model is commission-based, charging a percentage of the invoice and a booking fee to patients. The company targets private and elective doctors and patients with mobility or time limitations, indicating a niche but growing market segment. The website indicates funding support from Wirtschaftsagentur Wien, suggesting local government endorsement. The partnership ecosystem includes web design by Ameisenhaufen.at and use of third-party analytics and consent tools. Growth indicators include recent founding in 2022 and active digital marketing presence. The company emphasizes ease of use, safety, and efficiency in healthcare delivery.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is managed with detailed categories, reflecting GDPR compliance. Security plugins such as honeypot and wp-armour-extended are in use, reducing risk of automated attacks. However, explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are not evident, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Incident response and security policy documents are absent, indicating a gap in formal security governance. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business scale but could be improved with enhanced headers, documented policies, and regular security assessments.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and incident response plan accessible on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Conduct regular penetration testing and vulnerability scans to proactively identify and remediate security issues.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  5. Maintain up-to-date software and plugins to reduce risk from known vulnerabilities and improve overall security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Homedoc
Description
Homedoc is a service that coordinates medical home visits and office visits in Vienna and surrounding areas, offering patients convenient access to doctors at home or office.
Key services
Online booking of home doctor visits, Route and appointment optimization for doctors, Payment processing and invoicing, Patient communication management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Enfold Theme 5.0.1, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, CookieYes consent management, Selectize.js
Frameworks
WordPress, Enfold Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with detailed categories
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (honeypot, wp-armour-extended)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Hotjar
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website provides clear information about medical home visit services in Vienna
  2. Strong focus on user privacy and cookie consent
  3. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools
  4. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  5. Good business transparency with contact info and legal pages
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Enfold theme, which provides a flexible and responsive design. It integrates several third-party tools including Yoast SEO for search optimization, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking, and CookieYes for cookie consent management. The site uses lazy loading for images and asynchronous loading for scripts to optimize performance. While the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, the site uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in speed and accessibility. The technical stack is well-suited for the business needs but could benefit from enhanced security headers and more robust accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with homedoc.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review homedoc.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.