Skip to main content

Security report for hollandshardste.nl

Hollands Hardste Porno Blog! · Media · Netherlands

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hollands Hardste Porno Blog! is a Dutch-language adult entertainment blog providing daily pornographic content primarily in video format. The website targets adult audiences interested in niche Dutch pornographic material. It operates on a WordPress CMS platform with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Flowplayer for video playback. The site is hosted by team.blue nl B.V. and has been active since 2013, indicating a stable presence in its niche market. The business model revolves around content publishing and monetization through advertising networks. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap and jQuery, with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and does not implement DNSSEC, which could improve domain security. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies, and no GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is absent, reducing business credibility and user trust. Overall, the site is functional but basic in content quality and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hollandshardste.nl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche segment in the adult media industry, focusing on Dutch pornographic content. Its longevity since 2013 suggests a consistent user base and content update frequency. The business relies on advertising revenue, as evidenced by multiple ad network integrations. The absence of formal privacy and security policies may expose it to regulatory risks, especially under GDPR. The site does not provide direct contact channels, which may limit user engagement and trust. Social media links are placeholders, indicating limited social media presence or marketing. The technical infrastructure is standard for small to medium WordPress-based sites, with opportunities for security and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website has HTTPS enabled, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks DNSSEC, security headers, and visible security policies, which are important for enhancing security posture and protecting users. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, limiting the site's ability to handle security incidents effectively. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates poor compliance with data protection regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with significant room for improvement to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve domain name system security.
  2. Implement essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  4. Add clear contact information including security and abuse contacts to improve trust and incident response readiness.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hollands Hardste Porno Blog!
Description
Voor je dagelijkse ontspanning en porno!
Key services
Pornographic blog content, Video posts, Advertising space
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 3.7.1, Bootstrap, Flowplayer, Google Fonts, Akismet, FV WordPress Flowplayer plugin
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
45/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
magsrv.com, realsrv.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content blog in Dutch language
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Uses WordPress CMS with common plugins
  5. Advertising is present via third-party ad networks
  6. No advanced security headers or policies detected
  7. No GDPR compliance indicators present
  8. Content is explicit adult material targeting Dutch-speaking adults
  9. Social media links are placeholders with no actual URLs
  10. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Flowplayer for video content. It uses Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and Google Fonts for typography. The site is hosted by team.blue nl B.V., a reputable hosting provider. Performance is moderate with good mobile responsiveness and basic accessibility features. However, the site lacks advanced security configurations and privacy compliance mechanisms. The technical implementation is standard for a small adult content blog but would benefit from modernization in security and privacy areas to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hollandshardste.nl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hollandshardste.nl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.