Skip to main content

Security report for hlaspacientu.cz

Spolek Hlas onkologických pacientů · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hlaspacientu.cz represents a Czech non-profit organization advocating for oncology patients and their families, aiming to improve quality of life despite illness. The website serves as an information hub, providing educational materials, patient journey guidance, and advocacy resources. It targets oncology patients and their close ones within the Czech Republic, positioning itself as a trusted voice in the healthcare non-profit sector. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Colibri WP theme, hosted by Wedos, and incorporates modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Swiper.js for interactive content. Performance and mobile optimization are good, though accessibility could be improved. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, but lacks a publicly available security policy or incident response details. Privacy compliance is strong, featuring a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism aligned with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with its mission, though it could benefit from enhanced transparency around security and incident response.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of hlaspacientu.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hlaspacientu.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hlaspacientu.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hlaspacientu.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a small-sized non-profit focused on healthcare advocacy, specifically oncology. Its business model revolves around providing support, education, and advocacy rather than commercial revenue. The website's clear branding, consistent messaging, and active social media presence indicate a well-managed outreach strategy. The domain age and WHOIS data support legitimacy and organizational stability since 2019. The absence of commercial advertising or affiliate programs aligns with its non-profit nature. Growth potential lies in expanding educational content and community engagement. Partnerships are not explicitly listed but social media channels suggest active community interaction. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced security transparency and potential expansion of contact channels to improve stakeholder trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and multiple security headers implemented, reducing common web vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the lack of a published security policy, vulnerability disclosure program, or incident response contact information indicates gaps in transparency and preparedness. Cookie consent mechanisms are GDPR compliant, reflecting good privacy practices. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and incident response procedures to enhance trust and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is good for a non-profit but can be improved to meet higher standards expected in healthcare-related advocacy.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and commitments.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Enhance website accessibility to meet WCAG standards for broader inclusivity.
  4. Add incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Spolek Hlas onkologických pacientů
Description
Jsme hlas onkologických pacientů a jejich blízkých. Usilujeme o to, aby navzdory nemoci mohli pacienti žít kvalitní život.
Key services
Information about disease and treatment, Patient journey support, Educational materials, Advocacy and awareness
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Colibri WP Theme, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Swiper.js, Hummingbird performance plugin
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Czech non-profit focused on oncology patient advocacy.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with a modern theme and plugins.
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanism.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. Social media presence is strong and consistent.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
  7. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and widely used CMS platform, WordPress, with a modern theme (Colibri WP) and performance optimization plugins like Hummingbird. It uses Google Fonts and Google Analytics for typography and analytics respectively. The hosting provider is Wedos, a reputable Czech hosting company. The site shows good mobile responsiveness and moderate loading performance. Technical debt appears low with no visible broken elements or errors. Opportunities for modernization include improving accessibility features and implementing advanced security headers or mechanisms. The current technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission effectively but should be monitored for plugin updates and security patches to maintain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium15 findings · partial scanView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hlaspacientu.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hlaspacientu.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.