Skip to main content

Security report for hillrom.at

Hillrom · Healthcare · Austria

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in SSL/TLS.

Security score

86/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hillrom is a global medical technology company specializing in connected care solutions that improve the lives of patients and healthcare providers. The company offers a broad portfolio of products including smart beds, patient monitoring systems, safe lifting and transport solutions, and clinical workflow tools. Positioned as a subsidiary of Baxter International, Hillrom targets healthcare institutions and professionals with innovative medical equipment and integrated digital solutions. The website reflects a professional and enterprise-grade digital presence with consistent branding and comprehensive content tailored to healthcare audiences. Technically, the website is built on Adobe Experience Manager with React.js components, leveraging modern web technologies and analytics platforms such as Matomo and Google Tag Manager. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices. Security is well addressed with HTTPS, security headers, and secure form validations, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly disclosed. The absence of WHOIS data due to privacy protection limits domain registration insights, but the overall digital footprint, including structured data and external domain relationships, supports the legitimacy of the business. Privacy compliance is strong with GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. No adult or unsafe content is present, making the site suitable for general audiences. Overall, Hillrom's website presents a mature, secure, and professional platform that aligns with its enterprise healthcare market position, though improvements in transparency around security policies and incident response would enhance trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 20 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hillrom.at

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
86

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hillrom operates in the healthcare technology sector as a subsidiary of Baxter International, focusing on connected care solutions. Its business model is B2B, serving hospitals, clinics, and healthcare providers with advanced medical equipment and digital integration services. The company leverages its parent company's global reach and resources to maintain a strong market position. The website's multilingual and regional domain structure indicates a broad international presence. Key competitive advantages include a comprehensive product portfolio, integration capabilities, and a focus on improving patient outcomes and clinical workflows. The company appears to invest in digital marketing and analytics to optimize customer engagement and service delivery. Partnerships with Baxter and related domains reinforce its ecosystem. Growth indicators include continuous product innovation and expansion into new markets. The website content and structure support a professional and trustworthy brand image.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and secure form validation mechanisms. Use of OneTrust for cookie consent and Matomo for privacy-conscious analytics indicates attention to data protection. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy or vulnerability disclosure page limits transparency. No incident response or abuse contact information is found, which is a gap in readiness communication. The absence of DNSSEC information suggests an area for improvement in domain security. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good for an enterprise healthcare website but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page detailing security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information such as security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  4. Enable DNSSEC to strengthen domain name system security.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Hill-Rom Holdings, Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hillrom
Description
Hillrom is a medical technology provider that supplies medical equipment for hospitals and healthcare providers.
Key services
Smart beds and mattresses, Patient monitoring, Safe lifting and transport solutions, Clinical workflow solutions, Patient positioning, Integrated connectivity, Diagnostic cardiology, Medical examination and diagnosis
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), React.js, Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Typekit Fonts, Google Fonts, Material Icons
Frameworks
React, Adobe Launch (Adobe DTM)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with validation
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Wisepops
Tracking pixels
Matomo, OneTrust
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent, Wisepops
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or privacy-protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. Strong use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  4. Comprehensive privacy and cookie policies present with GDPR compliance.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. Multiple external domains linked, mostly related to parent company Baxter and regional sites.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Content is focused on healthcare technology and solutions.
  9. Good mobile optimization and accessibility features observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust technical infrastructure using Adobe Experience Manager CMS and React.js for frontend components, ensuring a modern and dynamic user experience. Integration with Google Tag Manager and Matomo provides comprehensive analytics capabilities while respecting user privacy. The site uses Typekit and Google Fonts for typography and Material Icons for UI elements, contributing to a consistent and professional design. Performance is moderate with preloading of key images and asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features such as skip links and ARIA roles are implemented, enhancing usability. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and structured JSON-LD schema. Hosting details are not explicit, but the presence of Adobe and cloud-based services suggests enterprise-grade hosting. Technical risks are minimal but include reliance on multiple third-party scripts which require ongoing security monitoring.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hillrom.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hillrom.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.