Skip to main content

Security report for hematologieonkologie.cz

Hematologicko-onkologické oddělení, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň · Healthcare · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Hematologicko-onkologické oddělení FN Plzeň website represents a specialized healthcare department within the Faculty Hospital Plzeň, uniquely accredited for all types of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the Czech Republic. The site provides comprehensive information about their services, accreditations, and partnerships, targeting patients and healthcare professionals. The business model focuses on delivering advanced hematology and oncology treatments, supported by clinical research and quality management. Technically, the website employs modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and Cookiebot for GDPR compliance, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. However, some technical improvements could enhance accessibility and security headers. Security posture is moderate with cookie consent implemented but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response information. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations, though WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting full domain trust analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hematologieonkologie.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization holds a strong market position as the only fully accredited transplant center in the Czech Republic, offering a broad range of hematology and oncology services. Their partnerships with pharmaceutical companies and national registries enhance their ecosystem. The business model is service-oriented within a hospital setting, with revenue likely derived from healthcare services and research funding. The website reflects a mature digital presence with clear navigation and relevant content for patients and professionals. Growth indicators include active clinical studies and quality management centers. Strategic partnerships with Takeda Pharmaceuticals and accommodation providers support patient care and operational excellence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. Cookie consent mechanisms are properly implemented using Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which are recommended best practices. The absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure information suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance browser security.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the main navigation to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure information to demonstrate security readiness and transparency.
  4. Conduct regular audits of third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable components are in use.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet higher standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hematologicko-onkologické oddělení, Fakultní nemocnice Plzeň
Description
Jediné transplantační centrum v ČR komplexně akreditované pro všechny typy transplantací krvetvorných buněk. Nabízí léčbu a spolupráci při léčbě všech hematologických maligních a nemaligních onemocnění.
Key services
Transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells, Diagnostic and therapeutic services for hematological malignancies, Patient accommodation support, Clinical studies and quality management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Font Awesome, Ionicons, Google Fonts, LayerSlider, Owl Carousel, FancyBox, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating privacy protection or registry restrictions.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented with Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies and frameworks.
  6. Certifications and accreditations are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; potential area for improvement.
  8. No visible terms of service or privacy policy pages detected in the HTML content.
  9. External links mostly point to trusted domains related to healthcare and partners.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, and various plugins like LayerSlider and Owl Carousel for enhanced UI components. Cookiebot is integrated for cookie consent management, supporting GDPR compliance. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good navigation clarity. However, no CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Hosting provider details are not available from the content. The site could benefit from improved SEO meta tags and accessibility enhancements. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional healthcare website but has opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hematologieonkologie.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hematologieonkologie.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.