Skip to main content

Security report for helphospital.org

Healthcare · India

Critical risk. 13 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 4 other checks.

Security score

24/100

Risk levelCritical

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Helping Hands Medical Project Jadan India is a small non-profit organization focused on improving healthcare quality and access in Rajasthan, India. The website serves primarily as an informational and fundraising platform with minimal content and basic navigation. The technical infrastructure is based on an outdated WordPress CMS with legacy jQuery libraries, lacking modern security and privacy features. No HTTPS is detected, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating low compliance with current data protection standards. The absence of contact information and WHOIS transparency further reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the website demonstrates limited digital maturity and security posture, exposing it to potential risks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

13 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  4. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching helphospital.org

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
55
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
24

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates in the healthcare non-profit sector, targeting donors and supporters interested in improving health outcomes in Rajasthan. The business model revolves around fundraising and project support. Market positioning is niche with limited online presence and no visible partnerships beyond a related Czech domain. The lack of detailed business information, certifications, or trust signals limits credibility. Growth potential may be constrained by the minimal digital footprint and outdated technology stack.

Security posture

The security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, lack of security headers, and use of outdated WordPress and jQuery versions. No incident response or security policies are published, and no contact channels for security issues are provided. These factors increase the risk of data breaches and undermine user trust. The website should prioritize upgrading to HTTPS, implementing security best practices, and publishing relevant policies to improve its security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all website traffic.
  2. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Endowment fund to improve quality and improving access to healthcare in Rajasthan, India. The organization appreciates any support that will help improve health or save lives.
Key services
Healthcare support projects, Fundraising, Community health improvement
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress 4.9.3, jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery Migrate 1.4.1, Fancybox for WordPress, NextGEN Gallery
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small non-profit healthcare support organization focused on Rajasthan, India.
  2. Content is minimal and basic with no advanced metadata or structured data.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on homepage.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided in the HTML content.
  5. Website uses outdated WordPress and jQuery versions, which may pose security risks.
  6. No HTTPS detected in URLs; site appears to be served over HTTP only.
  7. No security headers or advanced security mechanisms detected.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No social media links or contact information found.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website runs on WordPress 4.9.3 with jQuery 1.12.4 and uses plugins like Fancybox and NextGEN Gallery. The site lacks HTTPS and modern security headers, which is a significant technical deficiency. Performance is moderate but could be improved with updated technologies and optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, indicating room for improvement. SEO is minimal with no advanced metadata or structured data present. The technical debt is notable due to outdated software and missing security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with helphospital.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review helphospital.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.