Skip to main content

Security report for hellyhansen.com

Retail · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website hellyhansen.com is currently inaccessible due to a CAPTCHA security challenge, preventing extraction of meaningful content or metadata. The domain is well-established, created in 1997, and registered through a reputable registrar, indicating a legitimate business presence. However, the lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess business descriptions, policies, or contact information. The technical infrastructure includes bot protection mechanisms, but no further technology stack details are available. Security posture cannot be fully evaluated due to content blocking, though domain registration status suggests standard protections are in place. Overall, the site appears to be a legitimate retail brand but requires removal or adjustment of WAF restrictions to enable comprehensive analysis.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hellyhansen.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hellyhansen.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
2,313
Employees
14
Customers
2,260
Third parties
39
Weak passwords
7%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 14 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hellyhansen.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –brandmaster.hellyhansen.com2026-06-06
  • –brandmaster.hellyhansen.com2026-05-15
  • –brandmaster.hellyhansen.com2026-05-11
  • –brandmaster.hellyhansen.com2026-03-26
  • –ter.hellyhansen.com2026-01-11

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the CAPTCHA challenge blocking content, detailed business intelligence is unavailable. The domain age and registrar data imply a mature retail business likely focused on apparel or outdoor gear, consistent with the Helly Hansen brand known in the market. No direct information on market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships could be extracted from the provided data.

Security posture

The presence of a CAPTCHA challenge indicates an active security posture against automated threats. However, no security headers or policies were detectable in the accessible content. The domain registration status flags provide protection against unauthorized transfers. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts were found. Overall security maturity cannot be fully assessed due to limited data.

Recommendations

  1. Reduce or configure WAF/CAPTCHA to allow automated security and compliance scanning.
  2. Publish clear privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies accessible without challenge.
  3. Provide visible contact information and security incident response contacts on the website.
  4. Implement and expose security headers and HTTPS best practices.
  5. Consider adding vulnerability disclosure and data protection officer information to improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Content is a CAPTCHA challenge page from captcha-delivery.com indicating WAF or bot protection blocking full content access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor

Technology

Stack
captcha-delivery.com script

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a CAPTCHA security mechanism preventing full content analysis.
  2. No metadata, forms, contact info, or policies found in the accessible HTML content.
  3. Domain WHOIS data indicates a legitimate, longstanding domain with proper registration status.
  4. External scripts relate to CAPTCHA service indicating bot protection.
  5. No direct business or security policy information available from the provided content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses external CAPTCHA scripts from captcha-delivery.com indicating bot mitigation technology. Hosting is managed via CSC Corporate Domains, Inc. The lack of accessible HTML content prevents assessment of CMS, frameworks, or performance. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could be considered for enhanced DNS security. Overall, technical infrastructure appears standard but obscured by security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 72/100Medium28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hellyhansen.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hellyhansen.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.