Skip to main content

Security report for hellobecca.com

Becca · Hospitality · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Becca is a hospitality advisory and communications agency with a strong market presence, operating from offices in New York, Los Angeles, and London. The company focuses on shaping stories, honing visions, and growing audiences for hospitality brands, positioning itself as a strategic partner in the hospitality industry. Their key services include communications, experiences, social media, and strategic advisory through their Parrish Co brand. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, leveraging WordPress and associated technologies to deliver a rich user experience with strong SEO and social media integration. Security posture is good with HTTPS, modern TLS protocols, and Cloudflare CDN, though some advanced security headers and DNS protections could be improved. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with user data collected primarily via secure forms. Overall, the site demonstrates high professionalism and trustworthiness, suitable for its target audience in the hospitality sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hellobecca.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Becca operates in the hospitality sector, targeting hospitality brands and businesses seeking advisory and communications services. Their business model revolves around providing strategic advisory, communications, and experience design to elevate brand presence and audience engagement. The company showcases a diverse client portfolio including notable hospitality brands, indicating strong industry relationships and market positioning. The use of multiple offices across major cities suggests a medium-sized enterprise with international reach. Their digital ecosystem includes integrations with Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and CookieYes for marketing and compliance. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled contact via forms, enhancing lead management. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, indicating an independent operation. The company maintains a consistent brand identity and high-quality content, supporting its credibility and market reputation.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with modern TLS 1.3 and 1.2 protocols, ensuring encrypted communications. It uses Cloudflare as a CDN and security layer, providing protection against common web threats and performance benefits. Security headers such as cache-control and HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite cookie flags are present, enhancing session security. No critical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed, FREAK, or Logjam are detected. However, the site lacks HSTS, OCSP stapling, DNSSEC, and CAA records, which are recommended for enhanced security posture. No explicit security policy or incident response information is published, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. The site uses Gravity Forms with reCAPTCHA v3 for form security, mitigating spam and abuse risks. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened with additional best practices and published policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload to enforce HTTPS and prevent protocol downgrade attacks.
  2. Implement OCSP stapling to improve SSL certificate revocation checking performance and reliability.
  3. Deploy DNSSEC to protect DNS queries from spoofing and cache poisoning attacks.
  4. Add CAA DNS records to restrict which certificate authorities can issue certificates for the domain.
  5. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress, hosted on WP Engine, and protected by Cloudflare CDN. It uses modern web technologies including jQuery, Gravity Forms for form handling, Yoast SEO for search optimization, and WP Grid Builder for content layout. The site is well-optimized for performance and mobile responsiveness, with preloaded fonts and optimized images. SEO is enhanced with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph tags, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are present but not deeply detailed. The site integrates marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel, alongside a cookie consent mechanism via CookieYes. No major technical debt or outdated libraries are detected. The site demonstrates a mature and modern technical infrastructure supporting business goals effectively.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hellobecca.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hellobecca.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.