Skip to main content

Security report for hebbia.ai

Hebbia · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hebbia is a technology company specializing in AI-powered solutions tailored for the finance and legal sectors. Their platform leverages generative AI to automate and enhance complex business processes such as document analysis, deal diligence, and business intelligence. The company positions itself as a serious AI partner for professional firms, supported by significant Series B funding and a client base including reputable financial and legal institutions. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks like Next.js and React, integrating multiple marketing and analytics tools while maintaining good privacy compliance through cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though improvements in security headers and incident response transparency are recommended. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, potentially indicating privacy protection or domain registration issues, which slightly impacts trustworthiness. Overall, Hebbia presents a professional, well-designed digital presence with strong business credibility in its niche market.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hebbia.ai

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hebbia.ai, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for hebbia.ai right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hebbia operates in the finance and legal technology sectors, offering AI-driven SaaS solutions that streamline and accelerate critical workflows such as contract analysis, earnings summaries, and market tracking. Their business model focuses on B2B engagements with medium to large enterprises, emphasizing efficiency gains and data-driven decision making. The company demonstrates strong market positioning through high-profile clients and recent funding rounds. Their ecosystem includes integrations with major advertising and analytics platforms, supporting targeted marketing and user engagement. However, the lack of publicly available contact information and WHOIS transparency may pose challenges for trust and customer assurance. Strategic partnerships and a broad use case portfolio indicate growth potential and a diversified service offering.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and employs cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements, reflecting a mature approach to privacy and security. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options suggests room for enhancement in defense-in-depth strategies. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and readiness communication. Overall, the security posture is good but could be strengthened by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page with clear contact channels for vulnerability reporting.
  3. Provide verified company contact information on the website to enhance trust and customer support.
  4. Conduct accessibility audits and improve features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and domain legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hebbia
Description
Hebbia provides an AI platform focused on finance and legal sectors, enabling firms to leverage generative AI for serious work and business outcomes.
Key services
AI Agents for finance and legal work, Document analysis and diligence automation, Business intelligence and deal negotiation insights
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Next.js, React, Apollo, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter UWT, Osano Consent Management
Frameworks
Next.js, React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics via GTM, Apollo Website Tracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Ads, Twitter Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Twitter UWT
Marketing tools
Mutiny Personalization
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on AI solutions for finance and legal sectors.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance observed.
  4. No public contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information available.
  6. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues or privacy protection.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including Next.js and React, enabling server-side rendering and efficient client-side interactivity. Integration with multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Twitter UWT indicates a sophisticated digital marketing infrastructure. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and SEO optimization with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in load times achievable through optimization of third-party scripts and image delivery. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or headless architecture. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and scalable online presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hebbia.ai. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hebbia.ai.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.