Skip to main content

Security report for heaven.fr

heaven · Media · France

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

28/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

heaven is a next generation advertising agency based in Paris, France, specializing in digital and social media campaigns targeting next-generation consumers. The company is part of the Hopscotch Group, indicating a strong backing and market presence. Their website showcases a portfolio of projects with major clients, emphasizing innovation and digital-first strategies. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and uses Cloudflare CDN for delivery, but lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support which is a critical security concern. The site is mobile optimized and well structured with good content quality, but lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and security policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment, privacy compliance, and security transparency are recommended to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching heaven.fr

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
0
Average
28

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the media sector as an advertising agency with a focus on digital and social media marketing. Their business model revolves around creating campaigns, experiences, and conversations for brands to engage next-generation consumers who are digitally native and socially connected. The agency has a medium size profile with a professional online presence and a notable client list including global brands. Their affiliation with Hopscotch Group strengthens their market position. The website content and linked domains reflect a mature digital ecosystem with CRM and project subdomains. However, the lack of visible privacy and security policies may affect client confidence and regulatory compliance. The company appears growth-oriented with a strong emphasis on innovation and digital culture.

Security posture

The website currently lacks a valid SSL certificate, resulting in no HTTPS support and no modern TLS protocols enabled, which is a critical security vulnerability. No HSTS policy is implemented, and OCSP stapling and session resumption are disabled, reducing security and performance. Security headers are minimal and do not include advanced protections. No security or incident response policies are publicly disclosed, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. While Cloudflare CDN is used, the absence of proper SSL and security configurations significantly weakens the security posture. Immediate remediation of SSL issues and implementation of security best practices are essential to protect user data and maintain trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and install a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all site traffic.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or TLS 1.3) and disable deprecated protocols.
  3. Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) with includeSubDomains and preload options.
  4. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
  5. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies on the website to improve compliance and user trust.
  6. Disclose security policies and incident response procedures to demonstrate security maturity.
  7. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file for transparency.
  8. Regularly audit and update all third-party libraries and scripts to avoid vulnerabilities.
  9. Improve accessibility features and SEO optimization for better user experience and reach.
  10. Maintain consistent branding and update content regularly to reflect company growth and services.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a custom theme 'lay' version 8.3.2. It uses jQuery 3.7.1 and Cloudflare as CDN and security provider. The hosting IP is 198.211.119.11, likely DigitalOcean. The site uses lazy loading for images and responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. Performance metrics are not available, but the site structure and CSS indicate a modern grid layout with mobile adaptations. However, the SSL configuration is invalid, and no HTTPS protocols are enabled, which is a major technical risk. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The technical stack is modern but requires urgent security improvements to meet industry standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with heaven.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review heaven.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.