Skip to main content

Security report for healthterminologies.gov.au

The Australian Digital Health Agency · Healthcare · Australia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The National Clinical Terminology Service (NCTS) website is operated by the Australian Digital Health Agency, providing authoritative clinical terminology products and tools to support Australia's healthcare community. The site offers access to national terminology releases, third-party licensed products, and terminology servers, positioning itself as a key government resource in digital health standards. The business model is government-funded and focused on healthcare interoperability and standards dissemination. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern front-end frameworks including Bootstrap and Vuetify, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though there is room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. Performance is moderate with a professional design and clear navigation. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers and a cookie consent mechanism indicates areas for enhancement to meet best practices and compliance requirements. WHOIS data is limited due to privacy policies but consistent with a legitimate Australian government domain. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professional, and serves an essential role in healthcare terminology management. Strategic improvements in security policies, privacy compliance, and accessibility would further strengthen its digital maturity and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching healthterminologies.gov.au

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
65
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Australian Digital Health Agency operates the NCTS as a government entity focused on healthcare digital standards. The agency holds a strong market position as the national authority for clinical terminologies, including SNOMED CT AU and related products. Revenue streams are likely government funded with licensing of third-party terminology products. The target customers are healthcare providers, IT professionals, and organizations requiring standardized clinical terminologies. The agency maintains partnerships with research organizations such as CSIRO (ONTOSERVER) and integrates third-party tools. Growth indicators include ongoing updates to terminology versions and syndication services. The agency's strategic focus is on interoperability and national digital health infrastructure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and no visible sensitive data leaks. The lack of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are published, limiting transparency in security management. Privacy compliance is partially addressed with a comprehensive privacy policy linked externally, but cookie consent mechanisms are absent. The use of Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy considerations. Overall, the site is secure but could improve in transparency and compliance to align with best practices and regulatory frameworks.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and tracking tools to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
The Australian Digital Health Agency
Description
The National Clinical Terminology Service (NCTS), operated by the Australian Digital Health Agency, manages, develops and distributes national clinical terminologies and related tools and services to support digital health requirements of the Australian healthcare community.
Key services
Australian National Terminology release including SNOMED CT AU, Third party terminology products licensing, Terminology tools and applications, National Terminology Server (ONTOSERVER deployment), National Syndication Server for automated downloads
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.8.10, Google Analytics, Bootstrap 4.3.1, jQuery 3.6.0, Moment.js, Material Icons, FontAwesome 5.8.1, Vuetify (implied by v- classes), XMLHttpRequest for API calls
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Vuetify
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies implied
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-operated clinical terminology service for Australia.
  2. Content is comprehensive and focused on healthcare terminology standards.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity detected.
  4. WHOIS data is limited due to privacy and policy restrictions.
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected, which may affect compliance.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly present; opportunity for improvement.
  7. Google Analytics is used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  8. No contact phone numbers or physical addresses explicitly found.
  9. Contact email is a government domain email (help@digitalhealth.gov.au).
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with Bootstrap and Vuetify frameworks, indicating a modern and responsive front-end design. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and Moment.js, supporting dynamic content and date handling. Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and icons from Material Icons and FontAwesome. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The technical stack is well-suited for the site's purpose but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and accessibility improvements to reduce technical debt and future-proof the platform.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with healthterminologies.gov.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review healthterminologies.gov.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.