Skip to main content

Security report for healthpartners.com

HealthPartners · Healthcare · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HealthPartners is a large, top-rated healthcare and insurance provider serving Minnesota and Wisconsin. The company offers a comprehensive range of services including health insurance plans, clinics, hospitals, pharmacy services, and wellness programs. Their market position is strong regionally, supported by a professional and well-branded website that clearly communicates their offerings and mission. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies such as Web Components and Adobe Experience Manager, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though there is room for improvement in security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the website reflects a mature digital presence aligned with industry standards and compliance requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching healthpartners.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention healthpartners.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
6,479
Employees
1
Customers
6,349
Third parties
129
Weak passwords
6%

Latest record dated 2025-08-19 · 35 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for healthpartners.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –owa.healthpartners.com2025-08-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HealthPartners operates an integrated healthcare and insurance business model targeting individuals and businesses in the US Midwest. Their competitive advantage lies in combining insurance and care delivery, supported by a strong brand and extensive network of clinics and hospitals. Revenue streams likely include insurance premiums, healthcare services, and wellness programs. The company maintains partnerships with online clinics and health information providers, enhancing their service ecosystem. The website content and structure indicate a focus on customer engagement, education, and service accessibility, positioning HealthPartners as a trusted regional healthcare leader.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. There is no publicly visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or outdated libraries were detected in the provided content. Compliance with privacy regulations is supported by comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, representing an area for enhancement.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations and improve user transparency.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to enhance trust and readiness.
  4. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
HealthPartners
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HealthPartners
Description
HealthPartners provides health care and insurance options that are simple and affordable, serving Minnesota and Wisconsin with clinics, hospitals, insurance plans, and wellness programs.
Key services
Health insurance plans, Clinics and hospitals, Pharmacy services, Wellness and rewards programs, Specialty care including orthopedics and cardiology
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Web Components, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), JavaScript ES Modules, CSS Custom Properties, SVG icons
Frameworks
StencilJS
Platforms
HealthPartners proprietary platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (canonical link uses https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript modules

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe DTM
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM
Marketing tools
Adobe DTM
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Comprehensive health care and insurance services offered
  3. Strong social media presence and verified contact information
  4. No signs of blocking or WAF interference
  5. Security policies and privacy statements are present and accessible
  6. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected
  7. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (AEM)
  8. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern technical stack utilizing Web Components and Adobe Experience Manager CMS, which supports modular and scalable content management. The use of ES modules and CSS custom properties indicates up-to-date frontend practices. Performance is moderate, with responsive design and accessibility features implemented. The site integrates third-party services such as Adobe DTM for analytics and tracking. There is no indication of legacy or vulnerable libraries. Opportunities exist to optimize performance further and enhance security configurations. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly digital experience aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with healthpartners.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review healthpartners.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.