Health Net · Healthcare · United States
Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.
Health Net is a large, established healthcare insurance provider primarily serving California residents with a broad portfolio of health plans including Medicaid (Medi-Cal), Medicare Advantage, Individual & Family Plans, and employer-sponsored plans. The company operates as a subsidiary of Centene Corporation and maintains a strong market position with comprehensive services targeting individuals, families, and businesses. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its diverse audience. Technically, the website leverages a modern technology stack including Adobe Experience Manager CMS, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and advanced consent management via Securiti.ai. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and employs real user monitoring and marketing automation tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Performance is moderate with good SEO and accessibility practices. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, uses Google reCAPTCHA v3, and integrates cookie consent mechanisms. However, explicit security policies and vulnerability disclosure pages are absent, and security headers are not visibly configured. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, suggesting a solid security posture but with room for improvement in transparency and policy publication. Overall, the website is trustworthy, professionally maintained, and compliant with privacy regulations including GDPR and CCPA. The domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, reinforcing legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include publishing dedicated security and incident response policies, enhancing security headers, and providing explicit vulnerability disclosure information to further strengthen trust and compliance.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
DKIM selector 'default' uses 440-bit key
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA keys for DKIM
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention healthnet.com, from OffSeq Breach.
16 subdomains affected
See the 10 newest leaked credentials
A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for healthnet.com.
Select it in the checkout above.
Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with healthnet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review healthnet.com.