Skip to main content

Security report for hdlove.com

Aylo Premium Ltd. · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

RealityKings.com is a large-scale adult entertainment website operated by Aylo Premium Ltd., offering a vast library of HD pornographic videos under various branded collections such as HD Love. The site targets adult audiences with subscription-based access to premium content. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including React, Flickity for carousels, and integrates Google Analytics for traffic analysis. Payment processing is securely handled via Probiller, indicating a mature e-commerce infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and cookie consent mechanisms. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but is common in this industry for privacy reasons. Overall, the site is professional, secure, and compliant with adult content regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hdlove.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
65
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position in the adult media sector, leveraging a subscription model and affiliate partnerships to drive revenue. The extensive video catalog and multiple branded sites indicate a large operational scale. Partnerships with trusted payment processors and affiliate networks enhance monetization and trust. The business targets mature adult consumers globally, with content quality and branding consistency supporting user retention. The lack of public WHOIS data is a privacy measure typical for adult content providers. The company benefits from a robust digital marketing ecosystem including retargeting and analytics tools.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS and secure cookie usage. However, the lack of explicit Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options headers suggests room for improvement to mitigate clickjacking and cross-site scripting risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms align with GDPR requirements, indicating good compliance. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce a strict Content-Security-Policy header to reduce XSS risks.
  2. Add X-Frame-Options header to prevent clickjacking attacks.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards.
  5. Increase transparency around incident response and data protection officer contact information.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Aylo Premium Ltd.
Description
RealityKings.com offers a large collection of adult HD porn videos, specifically featuring the HD Love site collection with over 13,000 full-length videos. The business operates in the adult entertainment media sector targeting adult audiences.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Subscription memberships, Affiliate marketing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, JavaScript, Flickity carousel, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Probiller payment gateway
Frameworks
React
Platforms
Web desktop
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure cookies for auth tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
TrafficJunky
Marketing tools
Probiller
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed adult entertainment platform.
  2. Content is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  3. Strong legal and privacy compliance presence.
  4. Uses modern web technologies and analytics.
  5. No exposed security vulnerabilities detected in source.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable, reducing domain transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses a modern React-based frontend with dynamic content loading and carousel components for user engagement. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for design and analytics respectively. The site is optimized for desktop and mobile with responsive design elements. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Hosting details are not explicit but the infrastructure supports secure payment processing and user authentication. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. The technical stack supports scalability and user experience but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hdlove.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hdlove.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.