Skip to main content

Security report for hbf.com.au

HBF Health Insurance · Healthcare · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

HBF Health Insurance is a prominent not-for-profit health insurance provider in Australia, serving over one million members. The company offers a range of health insurance products including hospital cover, extras cover, ambulance cover, and life-stage specific plans. Their business model focuses on member-first service and affordable health cover, positioning them as a trusted leader in the Australian healthcare insurance market. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content tailored to their target audience of Australian residents seeking health insurance solutions. Technically, the website is built using modern web technologies such as Next.js and React, hosted likely on AWS infrastructure. It integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Dynatrace, and Abtasty for performance monitoring and user experience optimization. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, with good SEO practices and fast performance. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS, employs multiple security headers, and shows no signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is robust, with clear privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms in place. However, there is no publicly available vulnerability disclosure or incident response policy, which could be improved to enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a strong security posture and digital maturity, with minor areas for improvement in security policy transparency and continuous monitoring. The domain registration is privacy protected but registered through a reputable registrar, consistent with standard practices for commercial entities in Australia. The risk assessment is low, and the site is trustworthy for users seeking health insurance services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hbf.com.au

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
55
Email security
72
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

HBF Health Insurance holds a significant market position as a large, not-for-profit health insurer in Australia. Their competitive advantage lies in their member-first approach and comprehensive product offerings tailored to various life stages and health needs. Revenue streams primarily come from health insurance premiums across hospital, extras, and ambulance covers. The company targets individuals, couples, families, and single parents within Australia. Growth indicators include a large member base and active digital engagement through their website and social media channels. The partnership ecosystem includes integrations with Salesforce and Google services, enhancing customer relationship management and analytics capabilities. Strategic observations suggest a focus on digital transformation and customer-centric services to maintain market leadership.

Security posture

The security maturity of HBF's website is high, with enforced HTTPS, strong security headers, and no detected vulnerabilities in the public-facing site. Data protection practices align with GDPR and Australian privacy laws, supported by comprehensive privacy and cookie policies. However, the absence of a publicly available vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact limits transparency. There is no explicit mention of security frameworks such as ISO 27001 or NIST, which could be areas for future enhancement. Incident response readiness is unclear due to lack of public documentation. Overall, the security culture appears mature but could benefit from increased openness and formalized security governance disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a formal vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  2. Develop and make publicly available an incident response plan and contact channels for security incidents.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet or exceed WCAG 2.1 AA standards.
  5. Maintain continuous security monitoring and penetration testing to proactively identify and remediate risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
HBF Health Insurance
Description
Not-for-profit health insurance that puts members first. Find affordable health cover to suit your needs and join over 1m HBF members today!
Key services
Health insurance, Hospital cover, Extras cover, Ambulance cover, Online member management (myHBF)
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Dynatrace, Material UI, Abtasty
Frameworks
Next.js, Material UI
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security headers
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input handling

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Dynatrace, Pingdom
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Abtasty
Tracking pixels
Dynatrace, Pingdom
Marketing tools
Abtasty
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is comprehensive and relevant to health insurance customers.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  4. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity detected.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. Clear contact information with official phone numbers.
  7. No WHOIS registrant details publicly available, consistent with privacy protection policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern technology stack including React and Next.js, enabling server-side rendering and improved performance. Integration with Google Tag Manager and analytics services supports data-driven decision making. Hosting appears to be on AWS, providing scalable and reliable infrastructure. The site demonstrates excellent mobile optimization and accessibility, with responsive design and semantic HTML usage. Performance is fast with preloading and efficient resource management. Technical debt is minimal based on current observations, though continuous modernization and security patching are recommended to sustain operational excellence and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hbf.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hbf.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.