Skip to main content

Security report for haz-aubing.de

Hausarztzentrum Aubing · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hausarztzentrum Aubing is a small local healthcare provider based in Munich, Germany, offering comprehensive general medical and internal medicine services. The website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of services, a team of doctors, and accessible contact information. The business targets families and individuals seeking primary care and preventive health services. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and uses HTTPS, ensuring secure communication. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. The presence of third-party scripts for online reception introduces some risk that should be managed carefully. Overall, the site is functional, trustworthy, and serves its intended audience well.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching haz-aubing.de

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The practice operates in the healthcare sector with a focus on general and internal medicine. Its business model revolves around patient care services including acute illness treatment, vaccinations, and preventive check-ups. The website indicates a stable local market position with no evident parent or subsidiary companies. The absence of social media and limited online marketing tools suggests a traditional approach to patient engagement. The use of an online reception system indicates some digital maturity. The practice likely generates revenue through patient visits and associated medical services. The partnership ecosystem is minimal, with some reliance on third-party online reception services.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate certain web-based attacks. The use of external scripts from 321med.com without integrity checks could expose the site to supply chain risks. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or malware were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with basic hardening and policy disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner and cookie policy to comply with GDPR requirements.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Review and audit third-party scripts for security and privacy compliance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and SEO optimization to improve user experience and reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hausarztzentrum Aubing
Description
Im Herzen von Aubing bieten wir Ihnen mit unserem erfahrenen Team aus Allgemeinmedizinern und Internisten eine umfassende hausärztliche Betreuung für die ganze Familie. Von der Behandlung akuter Krankheiten über regelmäßige Vorsorgeuntersuchungen und Impfberatungen, bis hin zur Betreuung in der letzten Lebensphase sind unsere Ärzte für Sie und Ihre Familie da.
Key services
General medical care, Internal medicine, Vaccinations, Acute illness treatment, Preventive check-ups, End-of-life care
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Fonts, MetaSlider plugin, WPBakery Page Builder, WP Rocket
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional medical practice site for a general practitioner center in Munich, Germany.
  2. Content is in German and well structured with clear contact information and service descriptions.
  3. No signs of malicious content or phishing.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected, which may be a compliance gap.
  5. Use of third-party scripts from 321med.com for online reception functionality.
  6. No visible security.txt or incident response contact information.
  7. No social media links found on the homepage.
  8. WHOIS data is minimal but domain is active and connected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using popular plugins such as WPBakery Page Builder and MetaSlider. It uses jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site loads moderately fast but could benefit from further optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses WP Rocket for caching and lazy loading images, which helps performance. There is some technical debt in the form of commented-out scripts and unused CSS. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small medical practice website but could be modernized and hardened for better security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with haz-aubing.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review haz-aubing.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.