Skip to main content

Security report for havenenergy.com

Haven · Energy · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Haven Energy is a California-based company specializing in residential solar and battery backup systems, leveraging state rebate programs such as the SGIP Equity rebate to offer no-cost or reduced-cost installations to qualifying homeowners. Their market position is focused on providing reliable, clean energy solutions that reduce electric bills and protect against power outages. The company demonstrates a strong brand presence with clear trust indicators including BBB accreditation and industry association memberships. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates advanced analytics and marketing tools like Google Tag Manager, PostHog, and HubSpot, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure with good performance and mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and published security policies suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR compliance indicators. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-structured, supporting the company’s credibility in the energy sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching havenenergy.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Haven Energy operates in the renewable energy sector, targeting California homeowners interested in solar power and battery backup solutions. Their business model revolves around leveraging government rebate programs to reduce customer costs, supported by a full-service installation and support approach. The company benefits from strategic partnerships for recruitment and referral programs, enhancing growth and customer acquisition. Their competitive advantage lies in combining financial incentives with comprehensive service and strong customer testimonials. The company’s digital presence is robust, supporting marketing and analytics efforts to optimize outreach and customer engagement. Growth indicators include active social media channels and a clear focus on expanding rebate program participation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a public security policy or incident response contact reduces transparency and preparedness. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is limited by the absence of cookie consent mechanisms, potentially exposing the company to GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by adopting best practices in security headers, incident response transparency, and privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and provide dedicated incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner and privacy compliance mechanisms to meet GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Haven
Description
Haven provides solar and battery backup systems for homes, focusing on lowering electric bills by up to 90% and protecting against power outages. They offer no-cost systems to qualifying homeowners through California's SGIP Equity rebate program.
Key services
Solar panel installation, Battery backup system installation, SGIP Equity rebate application assistance, Site surveys, permitting, inspection, and ongoing support
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Next.js, Clerk.js, Webpack, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, HubSpot, AWS DNS
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern JavaScript libraries
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, PostHog, HubSpot
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Nextdoor Ads, ShareASale
Tracking pixels
PostHog
Marketing tools
HubSpot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus on solar and battery backup solutions.
  3. Strong presence of trust indicators including BBB accreditation and industry association memberships.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with company email and phone number.
  5. No explicit privacy or cookie consent mechanisms detected, which may impact GDPR compliance.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools indicates good digital maturity.
  7. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, ensuring server-side rendering and good SEO performance. Hosting on AWS provides scalable and reliable infrastructure. Integration with Clerk.js for authentication, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, and HubSpot indicates a sophisticated approach to user management, analytics, and marketing automation. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and demonstrates fast loading times. There is no detected CMS, suggesting a custom or framework-based build. Technical risks are minimal but include the need for improved security headers and privacy compliance features. Overall, the technical implementation supports a high-quality user experience and business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with havenenergy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review havenenergy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.