Skip to main content

Security report for hausbank.de

Finance · Germany

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.hausbank.de appears to be a German finance sector site, likely representing a banking institution or financial service provider. The site uses modern web technologies including Angular Material and custom CMS components, hosted on servers associated with atruvia, a known hosting provider. The presence of eTracker analytics indicates moderate user tracking for marketing or usage analysis purposes. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. No explicit contact information or security policies are found, limiting user trust and transparency. The site is accessible without WAF or security challenges, indicating no blocking or filtering issues. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate technical maturity but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security transparency to enhance trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hausbank.de

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hausbank.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
68
Employees
0
Customers
53
Third parties
15
Weak passwords
15%

8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hausbank.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the finance sector in Germany, likely as a medium-sized banking entity. The domain and hosting setup are consistent with professional operations. The lack of explicit business details, contact info, and certifications in the visible content limits deeper business intelligence insights. The site targets general banking customers in Germany, but no detailed audience segmentation or business model specifics are evident. The use of atruvia hosting and eTracker analytics suggests partnerships with established service providers. Growth indicators and subsidiary relationships are not discernible from the content provided.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses modern frontend frameworks, which is positive. However, no explicit security headers or policies are detected, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms is a compliance and security concern. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries are evident in the HTML. The security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing privacy compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement a cookie consent mechanism to comply with EU regulations.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  5. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, Angular (implied by cdk and mat-mdc components), eTracker (analytics)
Frameworks
Angular Material
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical link https://www.hausbank.de/startseite.html)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
eTracker
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
eTracker
Marketing tools
eTracker
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  2. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided HTML content.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided content.
  4. Uses Angular Material components and custom CMS assets.
  5. Includes eTracker analytics scripts for user tracking.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No data protection officer contact information found.
  8. Website content is primarily in German (lang=de-DE).
  9. No social media links or business certifications detected in the provided content.
  10. WHOIS data shows multiple authoritative nameservers under atruvia domain, indicating professional hosting.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses Angular Material components and a custom CMS, indicating a modern and modular frontend architecture. Hosting is managed by atruvia, a professional provider. Performance is moderate with preloading and module preloading of scripts. SEO basics like canonical links and meta tags are present but could be enhanced. Accessibility is basic with some focus-visible styles but no advanced ARIA landmarks detected. Analytics are implemented via eTracker, which is a common European analytics service. Technical debt is not evident from the HTML, but the lack of privacy and security policies indicates areas for modernization and compliance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium29 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hausbank.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hausbank.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.