Skip to main content

Security report for hausaerzte-neuhausen.de

Dr. Hundhausen und Dr. Braune · Healthcare · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dr. Hundhausen und Dr. Braune operate a small, local medical practice specializing in general and family medicine in München-Neuhausen. Their website provides comprehensive information about their services, team, office hours, and emergency contacts, positioning them as trusted primary care providers in their community. The practice emphasizes personalized care and up-to-date medical treatments, with additional services such as video consultations and disease management programs. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins like Yoast SEO and CoBlocks, delivering a good user experience with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, indicating a legitimate and consistent domain registration. Overall, the website reflects a professional and trustworthy healthcare provider with moderate digital maturity and good compliance with privacy regulations.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hausaerzte-neuhausen.de

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The practice targets local residents and families seeking general medical care in Munich. Their business model is a traditional medical office supplemented by digital appointment booking via DoctoLib. The website content and structure support patient engagement and trust-building, with clear contact details and emergency information. There is no evidence of extensive marketing or analytics tools, indicating a focus on patient care over commercial expansion. The practice maintains a consistent brand image and professional presentation, which supports their market position as a reliable healthcare provider. Partnerships appear limited to appointment scheduling services. Growth indicators include the adoption of video consultations and updated content reflecting current operations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts detected. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contact reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The site does not collect sensitive data directly, outsourcing appointment booking to a third party, which reduces risk. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small medical practice website but could be enhanced with standard security best practices and compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to ensure compliance with EU privacy laws.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and preparedness.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dr. Hundhausen und Dr. Braune
Description
Wir bieten eine qualifizierte allgemeinmedizinische, hausärztliche Versorgung für die ganze Familie. Bei allen akuten und chronischen Erkrankungen behandeln wir nach dem neuesten Stand der Medizin. Ziel ist es, akute Besserung zu verschaffen und die Gesundheit nachhaltig zu erhalten.
Key services
Allgemeinmedizinische Versorgung, Hausärztliche Versorgung, Check-ups, Hautkrebs-Screening, Impfmedizinische Beratung, Disease-Management-Programme, Psychosomatische Grundversorgung, Ultraschalluntersuchung, EKG, Laboruntersuchungen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.6.14, Yoast SEO plugin, CoBlocks plugin, jQuery 3.5.1, Google Fonts (Red Hat Text, Red Hat Display)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • No inline forms collecting sensitive data
  • Use of reputable plugins

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional medical practice site for general practitioners in Munich-Neuhausen.
  2. Content is comprehensive for a small medical practice, including team info, services, contact, and emergency info.
  3. No forms collecting sensitive data directly on the site; appointment booking is outsourced to DoctoLib.
  4. No cookie consent banner or explicit cookie policy found.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  6. Use of WordPress with common plugins and Google Fonts.
  7. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  8. No social media links found.
  9. WHOIS data is clean and consistent.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress 5.6.14 with Yoast SEO and CoBlocks plugins, leveraging Google Fonts for typography. The site loads jQuery 3.5.1 and related scripts asynchronously, supporting a responsive and interactive user experience. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The site is mobile optimized and accessible at a basic level, with skip links and semantic HTML elements. SEO is supported by Yoast plugin metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. There is no evidence of advanced frameworks or custom backend technologies. The site could benefit from modern security headers and enhanced privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hausaerzte-neuhausen.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hausaerzte-neuhausen.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.