Skip to main content

Security report for hashhedge.com

Hash Hedge · Finance · N/a

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hash Hedge is a proprietary trading firm specializing in funded crypto trading accounts, offering traders the opportunity to trade over 160 cryptocurrencies with zero risk to their own capital. The platform positions itself as a pioneer in crypto prop trading, targeting crypto traders seeking funded accounts and market freedom. The website is professionally designed using the Tilda CMS platform, with integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, and Hyros. The technical infrastructure is modern and hosted behind Cloudflare DNS, ensuring good performance and security. However, the site lacks published privacy, terms of service, and security policies, which are important for compliance and trust. The domain registration is consistent and trustworthy, with appropriate domain age and registrar locks, but DNSSEC is not enabled. Overall, the security posture is good but can be improved by adding security headers and formal policies. The website content is safe for general audiences and focused on finance and crypto trading services.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hashhedge.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hash Hedge operates in the finance and technology sectors, specifically targeting the crypto trading niche with a proprietary trading business model. The company was founded in 2021 and offers funded trading accounts, challenges, and trading of a wide range of cryptocurrencies. The business model relies on attracting skilled traders by providing capital and sharing profits, positioning itself as a risk-free entry point for crypto traders. The website integrates affiliate marketing tools (FirstPromoter) and uses multiple tracking services to optimize marketing efforts. No direct contact information or detailed company registration data is publicly available on the site, which may limit transparency. The presence of Trustpilot widget suggests an attempt to build trust through reviews. The company appears to be a small-sized entity focused on growth in the crypto prop trading market.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses domain locks to prevent unauthorized domain changes, indicating a baseline security posture. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended best practice for DNS security. The site lacks a Content Security Policy (CSP) header and does not publish security or incident response policies, which are important for transparency and compliance. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. The site uses multiple third-party tracking and marketing scripts, which may increase the attack surface if not properly managed. No exposed sensitive data or obvious vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in policy publication and DNS security.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a Content Security Policy (CSP) header to mitigate cross-site scripting and related attacks.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security incident response information.
  5. Improve accessibility features to enhance usability for all users and comply with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hash Hedge
Description
Trade 160+ cryptocurrencies and news events with no hidden fees. First prop trading platform designed for true market freedom
Key services
Funded crypto trading accounts, Trading of 160+ cryptocurrencies, News event trading, Prop trading challenges
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, jQuery 1.10.2, Tilda CMS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, FirstPromoter, Hyros tracking
Frameworks
Tilda Blocks, Tilda Animation
Platforms
Tilda CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain locked with multiple EPP status codes
  • No DNSSEC enabled (recommend enabling)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Yandex Metrika, Facebook Pixel, Hyros
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, Hyros
Marketing tools
Hyros
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear crypto prop firm focus.
  2. No privacy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  4. Multiple tracking and marketing scripts are used, indicating active marketing efforts.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the main site.
  6. Domain registration and DNS setup are secure but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  7. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site fully accessible.
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging Tilda's grid, animation, and popup libraries. It uses jQuery 1.10.2, which is an older version but still functional. The site integrates Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Yandex Metrika, FirstPromoter affiliate tracking, and Hyros marketing analytics, indicating a mature marketing infrastructure. Hosting is via Cloudflare DNS and CDN, providing performance and security benefits. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some deferred script loading and lazy loading of images. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected, but updating jQuery and adding modern security headers would be beneficial.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hashhedge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hashhedge.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.