Skip to main content

Security report for halfar.com

Halfar System GmbH · Retail · Germany

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Halfar System GmbH is a German manufacturer specializing in bags and backpacks, serving businesses with promotional and technical bag products since 1986. The company operates a professional e-commerce platform targeting organizations seeking durable and customizable bags. The website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and uses modern web technologies including Shopware CMS and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. Security practices include HTTPS enforcement and CSRF protection, though some security headers and explicit policies are missing. WHOIS data for the subdomain is unavailable, which is typical for subdomains but limits domain trust verification. Overall, the site presents a credible and professional business presence with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of halfar.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching halfar.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Halfar System GmbH holds a solid market position as a specialized bag manufacturer with a focus on quality and sustainability. Their business model combines manufacturing with direct online sales, targeting B2B customers for promotional and technical bags. The company leverages a German-language website with English support, indicating international reach. The product catalog is diverse, including advertising bags, special bags, and custom solutions. The absence of detailed WHOIS data for the subdomain suggests domain management under a parent domain. The company demonstrates moderate digital maturity with integrated analytics and consent management but lacks visible certifications or security policies on the site.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens in forms, indicating a baseline security posture. Google Consent Mode is implemented for privacy compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies reduce the overall security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site would benefit from enhanced security headers, a published security policy, and a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to improve trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the homepage.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency.
  4. Consider publishing a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clearer GDPR compliance indicators.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Halfar System GmbH
Description
Manufacturer of bags and backpacks since 1986, offering advertising bags, special bags, and custom-made products.
Key services
Production of advertising bags, Production of special technical bags, Custom bag manufacturing, Sales via online shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, FontAwesome, LazyLoad images, JavaScript, CSS3
Frameworks
Moorl Foundation (storefront CSS)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF tokens in forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Consent Mode for privacy

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform for a German bag manufacturer
  2. Content is in German with English language option available
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service explicitly found in provided HTML snippet
  4. Contact phone number is clearly displayed
  5. No email addresses found in the provided content
  6. Use of Google Tag Manager and Analytics with consent management
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure
  8. WHOIS data for subdomain not available, indicating it is a subdomain of a main domain
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Shopware CMS platform, utilizing modern frontend technologies such as FontAwesome for icons, lazy loading for images, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The presence of CSRF tokens in forms indicates secure form handling. However, no hosting provider information was detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with more ARIA attributes and semantic HTML enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 78/100Low28 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with halfar.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review halfar.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.