Skip to main content

Security report for hairclinic.lt

InSense Clinic · Healthcare · Lithuania

Medium risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Network security.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

InSense Clinic is a healthcare provider specializing in dermatology, plastic, and aesthetic surgery services with clinics located in Vilnius and Kaunas, Lithuania. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting patients seeking quality medical aesthetic treatments. The business operates under the umbrella of Kardiolitos klinikos, indicating a reputable market position in the regional healthcare sector. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including AngularJS, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for compliance and marketing. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and provides clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, although some security headers are missing and no explicit security or incident response policies are published. Privacy compliance is robust, with a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie management. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professionally maintained, though WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hairclinic.lt

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
83
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company is positioned as a medium-sized healthcare provider focused on aesthetic and dermatological services. Its affiliation with Kardiolitos klinikos suggests a strong partnership ecosystem and established market presence. The business model revolves around direct patient services with online appointment capabilities. Revenue streams likely include medical procedures and consultations. The website content and structure indicate a focus on patient engagement and transparency, supported by privacy and cookie policies. Growth indicators include multiple clinic locations and active news updates. The lack of social media links may indicate a controlled marketing approach or focus on direct patient relationships.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS and cookie consent compliance. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site lacks published security policies or incident response contacts, which could hinder rapid response to security incidents. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel introduces moderate tracking but is managed via consent. Overall, security practices are good but could be enhanced by publishing formal policies and implementing additional headers.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from external libraries.
  5. Consider integrating social media channels to improve marketing reach and trust signals.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
InSense Clinic
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
InSense Clinic
Description
„InSense Clinic“ - naujas „Kardiolitos klinikų“ dermatologijos ir estetinės chirurgijos centrų Vilniuje ir Kaune bei „SV plastinės chirurgijos centro“ vardas.
Key services
Plastinė ir estetinė chirurgija, Dermatologija, Kosmetologija
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
AngularJS (ng directives), Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot, Google Fonts, EasyWeb4 CMS
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language
  2. Strong cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms present
  3. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded
  4. No explicit security policy or incident response information found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone and email
  6. No social media links detected in footer or header
  7. Use of modern tracking and marketing tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel
  8. Website uses HTTPS with no visible mixed content issues
  9. No terms of service page detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on EasyWeb4 CMS with AngularJS frontend components, integrating Google Fonts, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Cookiebot for analytics and compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessible navigation. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from updating AngularJS to a more current framework version. The hosting provider is not explicitly identified. The site uses HTTPS with valid certificates, ensuring secure data transmission. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Accessibility is basic but present. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hairclinic.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hairclinic.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.