Skip to main content

Security report for hager.com

Hager Group · Energy · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Hager Group operates a professional corporate website serving as a global platform for their electrical installation solutions targeted primarily at B2B customers. The company is positioned as a leading provider in the energy sector with a strong international presence, supported by multi-language and regional site versions. The website is built on a modern technical stack including Sitecore CMS, Akamai CDN, and integrates Google Analytics and CookieHub for analytics and privacy compliance respectively. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though lacks visible security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent implemented but no explicit privacy or terms of service documents found in the provided content. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and trustworthy with a domain age consistent with an established enterprise. Recommendations include enhancing transparency with published privacy and security policies, enabling DNSSEC, and improving security headers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching hager.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
54
Security headers
85
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention hager.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,996
Employees
4
Customers
1,933
Third parties
59
Weak passwords
9%

Latest record dated 2026-05-16 · 31 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for hager.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –cme.hager.com2026-05-16
  • –login.hager.com2025-07-29
  • –cbms.hager.com2025-07-20
  • –www.cbms.hager.com2025-07-19

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Hager Group's website reflects a mature B2B business model focused on electrical installation solutions across residential, commercial, and industrial sectors. The company leverages a global network with localized sites for Europe, Africa, Middle East, Asia Pacific, and Americas, indicating a broad market reach. The use of Sitecore CMS and Akamai CDN suggests investment in scalable and performant digital infrastructure. The absence of direct contact details on the homepage may indicate a controlled lead generation approach or reliance on regional sites for contact. The partnership with Iboco in the US and the corporate parent site hagergroup.com highlight a structured partnership and corporate ecosystem. The website's multilingual support and regional segmentation demonstrate strategic localization efforts to address diverse markets.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses clientTransferProhibited status on the domain, indicating good baseline security practices. However, the lack of DNSSEC and absence of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduce the overall security posture. No forms or input fields were detected in the provided content, minimizing attack surface from input vulnerabilities. The site uses third-party scripts for analytics and cookie consent, which are industry standard but require ongoing monitoring for vulnerabilities. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which is a gap in transparency and security readiness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by adopting additional security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main site.
  2. Implement DNSSEC to enhance domain name system security.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Hager Group
Description
Hager Group is a leading provider of solutions and services for electrical installations in residential, commercial and industrial buildings.
Key services
Solutions and services for electrical installations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, CookieHub, Akamai CDN, Sitecore CMS, Bootstrap CSS, Video.js
Frameworks
Sitecore
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
CookieHub
Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a corporate B2B site for Hager Group, a leader in electrical installation solutions.
  2. Content is well structured with multi-regional language support links.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage HTML.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieHub.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service links detected in the provided HTML.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CDN for performance.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No visible security headers in the HTML content; may be set at server level but not confirmed.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  10. No social media links explicitly found in the provided HTML except Twitter handle in meta tags.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Sitecore CMS, leveraging Akamai CDN for content delivery, and uses modern JavaScript libraries including Google Tag Manager and CookieHub for analytics and privacy compliance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses Bootstrap CSS framework. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and CDN usage. SEO is supported by proper meta tags, Open Graph, and hreflang tags for multilingual support. Accessibility is basic but present. No broken elements or errors were detected in the provided HTML. The technical stack is modern and appropriate for an enterprise-level B2B website, though there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with hager.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review hager.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.