Skip to main content

Security report for gyrls.com

Naked erotic models and beautiful nudes at Gyrls · Media · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gyrls.com is an adult content blog specializing in erotic nude photography and softcore imagery, targeting fans of tasteful nude models and beautiful girls. The site operates as a free content platform with daily updates and curated links to partner adult websites, positioning itself as a niche media outlet within the adult entertainment sector. The business model relies on content aggregation and referral traffic to partner sites. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins and uses legacy jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking. The site is served over HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, but lacks modern security headers and uses outdated libraries, which may pose security risks. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating poor compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR. Contact information is limited to a contact form without explicit emails or phone numbers, reducing business transparency. The WHOIS data is missing or indicates the domain is unregistered, which raises significant legitimacy concerns despite the active website content. Overall, the site demonstrates basic technical and content quality but suffers from compliance and security shortcomings.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gyrls.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website targets a specific adult content niche with a focus on erotic nude photography, leveraging daily content updates to maintain user engagement. Its competitive advantage lies in aggregating content from multiple partner sites and providing curated links, which likely generate affiliate or referral revenue streams. The absence of clear business registration data and contact details limits trust and may hinder growth opportunities. The partnership ecosystem includes several adult content domains, suggesting a networked approach to content distribution. Growth indicators are unclear due to lack of business transparency. Strategic observations include the need for improved compliance, security posture, and clearer business identity to enhance credibility and market position.

Security posture

Gyrls.com exhibits a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data in the HTML content. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version (1.11.1) introduces potential vulnerabilities. The absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options weakens the site's defense against common web attacks. There is no evidence of published security policies, incident response plans, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, indicating limited security governance. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is poor due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The lack of registrant information in WHOIS data further complicates trust and accountability. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvements to mitigate risks and align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Update all outdated JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to improve protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
  5. Clarify domain registration and business ownership information to improve legitimacy and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Naked erotic models and beautiful nudes at Gyrls
Description
Your best free source for hot nude models, beautiful naked girls and erotic softcore babes.
Key services
Daily updated erotic nude photo blog, Curated links to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, WordPress, Very Simple Contact Form plugin, WP Show Posts plugin, Widget Options plugin, SlickNav
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content blog focused on erotic nude photography
  2. Content is updated daily with curated links to partner adult sites
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found; only a contact page with a form
  5. Uses outdated jQuery library which may pose security risks
  6. No security headers detected in HTML content
  7. HTTPS is enabled and Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking
  8. WHOIS data is missing or domain appears unregistered, raising legitimacy concerns
  9. No GDPR or data protection compliance indicators present
  10. Website design and content quality are basic with moderate SEO optimization
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with several plugins including Very Simple Contact Form, WP Show Posts, and Widget Options. It uses jQuery 1.11.1, which is outdated and may pose security risks. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for user tracking and analytics. The site loads CSS and JS assets from a CDN (cdn.gyrls.com) and uses asynchronous loading for analytics scripts, which is good for performance. Mobile optimization is basic with responsive CSS included but no advanced accessibility features detected. SEO is supported by All In One SEO Pack plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format describing organization and webpage metadata. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimizations noted. The technical stack is functional but shows signs of technical debt and modernization opportunities, especially in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gyrls.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gyrls.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.