Skip to main content

Security report for gycom.com

Gycom - En partner för din elkonstruktion · Energy · Sweden

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

32/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Gycom is a Swedish-based small business specializing in automation and electrical construction services, targeting industrial and manufacturing sectors. Their key offerings include elkonstruktion, PLC programming, commissioning, and project work, supported by technical partnerships with Eaton Electric AB and ABB. The website presents a professional image with good content quality and clear navigation, serving as a credible digital presence for their niche market. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with Elementor, employing modern libraries and scripts, and is mobile optimized with moderate performance. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of security headers and formal security policies suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies and lack of consent mechanisms. Overall, the site scores well on business credibility and technical implementation but should enhance privacy and security practices to reduce risk and improve compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching gycom.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
32

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Gycom operates as a B2B service provider in the energy and manufacturing sectors, focusing on automation solutions. Their market position is strengthened by partnerships with recognized technology providers Eaton and ABB, indicating a trusted technical ecosystem. The business model revolves around delivering specialized electrical and automation services to industrial clients, with reference projects showcasing successful implementations. The website content and structure support lead generation and client engagement, though the lack of explicit privacy and security policies may impact trust for privacy-conscious clients. Growth potential exists through expanding service offerings and improving digital compliance. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent small enterprise.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, ensuring encrypted communications. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting transparency in security management. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries are evident in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires enhancements in policy transparency and technical defenses to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to harden the website against attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and enhance user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities and maintain performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gycom - En partner för din elkonstruktion
Description
Från idé till drift. Automation för dina möjligheter. Gycom offers services in elkonstruktion (electrical construction), PLC programming, commissioning, and project work. They serve industries such as industrial automation, fire fighting systems, solid fuel boilers, and industrial vacuum cleaners.
Key services
Elkonstruktion, PLC-Programering, Driftsättning, Projektarbete
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, Elementor 3.29.2, Elementor Pro, jQuery 3.7.1, Swiper.js, Lenis smooth scroll
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear navigation and good SEO metadata.
  2. No explicit privacy or cookie policy pages found on the homepage or footer.
  3. Contact information is available via contact page links and email in structured data.
  4. No visible forms on the homepage; contact forms likely on /kontakt page.
  5. Technical partners Eaton and ABB are prominently displayed, enhancing trust.
  6. Google Analytics is used for tracking; no cookie consent mechanism detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL is enabled and appears well configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using Elementor and Elementor Pro, leveraging jQuery, Swiper.js for slideshows, and Lenis for smooth scrolling. The site uses Google Analytics via gtag.js for visitor tracking. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. The technical stack is current but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy tools to reduce risk and improve compliance posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with gycom.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review gycom.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.