Skip to main content

Security report for guzaj.si

SAMA Navitas d.o.o. · Hospitality · Slovenia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.guzaj.si is a cultural tourism platform dedicated to the historical figure Razbojnik Guzaj (Franc Guzej) in the Kozjansko region of Slovenia. It offers visitors stories, legends, events, walking paths, galleries, and library resources to promote local heritage. The site is supported by local municipalities and organizations such as SAMA Navitas d.o.o., the Ministry of Agriculture and Environment, and the European Commission, indicating a strong community and governmental backing. The target audience includes tourists, cultural enthusiasts, and local residents interested in regional history. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with jQuery and uses Cloudflare for DNS services. The site is moderately performant with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic but present with meta tags and Open Graph data. The site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as privacy and cookie policies, which are critical gaps. No forms collecting user data are present on the homepage, reducing immediate data protection risks. From a security perspective, HTTPS is enabled, which is a positive baseline. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance trust and preparedness. The site does not use tracking or advertising networks, minimizing privacy concerns but also indicating limited marketing sophistication. Overall, the website is a well-maintained cultural heritage site with good business credibility and moderate technical implementation. The main risks lie in privacy compliance and security best practices. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance trustworthiness and user confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching guzaj.si

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the hospitality and cultural tourism sector, focusing on promoting local heritage through storytelling, events, and tourist services. It benefits from partnerships with local municipalities and European funding bodies, which strengthens its market position in the regional niche. The business model relies on cultural promotion and tourism attraction rather than direct commercial sales. The website content and structure support this model by providing rich cultural content and event information. Growth indicators include multilingual support and community engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes government bodies and local organizations, which is a strategic advantage for funding and outreach.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is basic. HTTPS is implemented, but critical security headers are missing, which exposes the site to potential risks such as clickjacking and content injection. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The absence of incident response contacts and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms reduces readiness for security incidents. No vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content, but regular updates are necessary. The security culture appears minimal, with room for improvement in transparency and user data protection.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  3. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to improve security transparency.
  4. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SAMA Navitas d.o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SAMA Navitas d.o.o.
Description
The website promotes cultural and tourist services related to the historical figure Razbojnik Guzaj (Franc Guzej) in the Kozjansko region. It offers stories, legends, events, walking paths, galleries, and library resources focused on this local heritage.
Key services
Tourist services, Events, Walking paths, Library, Gallery, Cultural storytelling
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based cultural tourism site focused on a local historical figure.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  4. Contact information is provided clearly in the footer with email and phone numbers.
  5. No social media official links detected except embedded Facebook like plugin and YouTube iframe.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  7. No advanced security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts found beyond basic social plugins.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. Website is multilingual with language switcher for SL, EN, DE, IT.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with jQuery and includes plugins such as PrettyPhoto for media display. It leverages Google Fonts and Cloudflare DNS services. The site has a multilingual setup with language switcher functionality. Performance is moderate with no major errors detected. The HTML structure is valid and includes SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. However, the site lacks advanced technical SEO and accessibility features. The hosting provider is likely Telekom Slovenije or Cloudflare. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or progressive web app features, indicating some technical debt and opportunities for modernization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with guzaj.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review guzaj.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.